Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #67849
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
|---|---|
| From | JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> |
| Subject | About getters/setters |
| Message-ID | <kSg7F.32840$Xs5.970@fx06.am4> (permalink) |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2019-08-21 20:22 +0100 |
Which one is better:
1)
class Person
{
public:
int getAge() { return age;}
void setAge(int a) { age = a;}
private:
int age;
};
or
2)
struct Person
{
int age;
};
####
I know Herb Sutter recommended 1) but for example isocpp
https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rh-get
seems to recommend 2). Herb says that for example when debugging 1) is
good because you can write to file all the accesses of the age, or cout
all the calls. Also debugger can stop at the function call, but can
debugger stop at :
person.age = 6;
?
So debugger can put a red dot to setAge and see which object changed it.
And cout/write on file information.
Argument also, that later on can add other functionality punder setAge
(like cache logic).
But 2) people argue its so simple and not likely to change, so it breaks
OO idea.
I do currently 1) but wondering which way to go.
Like now I have a "Settings" class. Simple data members. I started
adding getters and setters....
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-21 20:22 +0100
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-21 19:34 +0000
Re: About getters/setters Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2019-08-21 21:40 +0200
Re: About getters/setters Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-08-21 12:52 -0700
Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-22 15:25 +0100
Re: About getters/setters Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-08-22 09:06 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-24 04:32 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-22 15:09 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2019-08-23 16:17 +1200
Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-23 05:26 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-08-23 18:07 +0000
Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-23 07:09 +0100
Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-23 07:13 +0100
Re: About getters/setters David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-08-23 09:30 +0200
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-25 06:16 +0000
Re: About getters/setters David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-08-25 12:12 +0200
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 11:24 +0000
Re: About getters/setters James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2019-08-23 08:34 -0400
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 14:48 +0000
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 15:49 +0000
csiph-web