Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #67897
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: About getters/setters |
| Date | 2019-08-23 16:17 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <gs97lsF3s0U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <kSg7F.32840$Xs5.970@fx06.am4> <86y2zk26ps.fsf@mailhub.linuxsc.com> |
On 23/08/2019 10:09, Tim Rentsch wrote:
> JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> writes:
>
> [some white space reformatting done]
>
>> Which one is better: 1)
>>
>> class Person {
>> public:
>> int getAge() { return age;}
>> void setAge(int a) { age = a;}
>> private:
>> int age;
>> };
>>
>> or 2)
>>
>> struct Person {
>> int age;
>> };
>>
>> ####
>>
>> I know Herb Sutter recommended 1) but for example isocpp
>>
>> https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rh-get
>>
>> seems to recommend 2). [...]
>>
>> I do currently 1) but wondering which way to go.
>>
>> Like now I have a "Settings" class. Simple data members. I started
>> adding getters and setters....
>
> I agree with Herb Sutter's recommendation that (assuming the
> class or struct has some member functions) data members should
> never be public. There are cases where for data members might
> plausibly be made protected rather than private, but never
> public.
There is a case where a data member is safe to be public: a const data
member. Access to such a member cannot change a class's invariants.
--
Ian.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-21 20:22 +0100
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-21 19:34 +0000
Re: About getters/setters Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2019-08-21 21:40 +0200
Re: About getters/setters Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-08-21 12:52 -0700
Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-22 15:25 +0100
Re: About getters/setters Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-08-22 09:06 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-24 04:32 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-22 15:09 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2019-08-23 16:17 +1200
Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-23 05:26 -0700
Re: About getters/setters Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-08-23 18:07 +0000
Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-23 07:09 +0100
Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-23 07:13 +0100
Re: About getters/setters David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-08-23 09:30 +0200
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-25 06:16 +0000
Re: About getters/setters David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-08-25 12:12 +0200
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 11:24 +0000
Re: About getters/setters James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2019-08-23 08:34 -0400
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 14:48 +0000
Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 15:49 +0000
csiph-web