Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #67897

Re: About getters/setters

From Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: About getters/setters
Date 2019-08-23 16:17 +1200
Message-ID <gs97lsF3s0U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <kSg7F.32840$Xs5.970@fx06.am4> <86y2zk26ps.fsf@mailhub.linuxsc.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 23/08/2019 10:09, Tim Rentsch wrote:
> JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> writes:
> 
> [some white space reformatting done]
> 
>> Which one is better:  1)
>>
>>      class Person {
>>        public:
>>          int getAge() { return age;}
>>          void setAge(int a) { age = a;}
>>        private:
>>          int age;
>>      };
>>
>> or  2)
>>
>>      struct Person {
>>          int age;
>>      };
>>
>> ####
>>
>> I know Herb Sutter recommended 1) but for example isocpp
>>
>> https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rh-get
>>
>> seems to recommend 2). [...]
>>
>> I do currently 1) but wondering which way to go.
>>
>> Like now I have a "Settings" class.  Simple data members.  I started
>> adding getters and setters....
> 
> I agree with Herb Sutter's recommendation that (assuming the
> class or struct has some member functions) data members should
> never be public.  There are cases where for data members might
> plausibly be made protected rather than private, but never
> public.

There is a case where a data member is safe to be public:  a const data 
member.  Access to such a member cannot change a class's invariants.

-- 
Ian.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-21 20:22 +0100
  Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-21 19:34 +0000
  Re: About getters/setters Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2019-08-21 21:40 +0200
  Re: About getters/setters Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-08-21 12:52 -0700
    Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-22 15:25 +0100
      Re: About getters/setters Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-08-22 09:06 -0700
        Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-24 04:32 -0700
  Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-22 15:09 -0700
    Re: About getters/setters Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2019-08-23 16:17 +1200
      Re: About getters/setters Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-23 05:26 -0700
      Re: About getters/setters Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-08-23 18:07 +0000
    Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-23 07:09 +0100
  Re: About getters/setters JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2019-08-23 07:13 +0100
    Re: About getters/setters David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-08-23 09:30 +0200
      Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-25 06:16 +0000
        Re: About getters/setters David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-08-25 12:12 +0200
  Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 11:24 +0000
    Re: About getters/setters James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2019-08-23 08:34 -0400
      Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 14:48 +0000
      Re: About getters/setters Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-23 15:49 +0000

csiph-web