Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #275213
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| References | (8 earlier) <msi5i3$2iq$3@dont-email.me> <xqednWH44q57AHHInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <msid1m$roe$1@dont-email.me> <w_6dnXBcL649JXHInZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> <mskie4$2pi$2@dont-email.me> |
| Subject | Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) |
| Date | 2015-09-07 12:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <OOidnc7QoqHKUnDInZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mskie4$2pi$2@dont-email.me... > On 06/09/2015 23:04, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:msid1m$roe$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 06/09/2015 21:10, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>> news:msi5i3$2iq$3@dont-email.me... >>>>> On 06/09/2015 09:28, Rocky wrote: >>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:msf99a$bmg$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> On 05/09/2015 16:48, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:7b13b459-d8cf-4d7d-aa13-33df781f08fd@googlegroups.com... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't care what her link says, you tried to suggest that the >>>>>>>>> bombs >>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>> able to vaporize the buildings without showing radiation because >>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>> "neutron" bombs until someone pointed out to you that "neutron" >>>>>>>>> bombs >>>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>>> exactly the opposite. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The real question is why don't you just listen to the person that >>>>>>>> knows >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> most? Here, I'll give you the link again: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And don't forget what you said about the Naudet Brothers editing >>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>> video. You said it was just a shadow but if that were true how >>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> smoke cloud make a square shadow? And if that were true then why >>>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>> Phantom Flight 11 make a shadow too? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And regardless of what you say about the shadow Runrunner cutout in >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> North Tower was still too short for the wingspan of a 767 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You still haven't provided any independent evidence that >>>>>>>>> underground >>>>>>>>> nukes >>>>>>>>> can affect the surface without bursting through and sending dirt >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> debris flying into the air. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oddly enough there is a video that shows an explosion when the nuke >>>>>>>> under >>>>>>>> WTC3 was detonated so maybe something did blast through after all. >>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do please provide the link to that video, or is it another piece of >>>>>>> evidence that you have 'lost'. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jump to 44:25 of the following video to see an explosion about 12 >>>>>> seconds >>>>>> before the bottom section of the North Tower is converted to ultra >>>>>> fine >>>>>> dust >>>>>> with the exception of the part that was not able to be nuked. BTW >>>>>> that >>>>>> explosion or just slightly before it coincides with an EMP recorded >>>>>> by >>>>>> WCBS. >>>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 Eyewitness rare unfiltered / unaltered amateur footage | What >>>>>> was >>>>>> NOT >>>>>> shown on TV >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k >>>>>> >>>>>> ******************** >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You argue that the "surviving walls" only survived because they >>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>> outside the range of the "underground nukes," but the picture you >>>>>>>>> keep >>>>>>>>> hawking shows a "surviving wall" right in the path of the >>>>>>>>> underground >>>>>>>>> nuke. >>>>>>>>> (Look in the lower right corner.) I pointed this out to you once >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>> responded; "That wall used to be taller" which misses the point >>>>>>>>> entirely. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Most all of WTC4 was missed even though the nuke that vaporized the >>>>>>>> South >>>>>>>> Tower was detonated under WTC4. But it might not have been planned >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> way >>>>>>>> or I'm sure they would have tried harder not to blow up part of >>>>>>>> Fiterman >>>>>>>> Hall when they nuked WTC7. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ***** ORIGINAL POST BELOW ***** >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok, I've recently been saying that buildings at Ground Zero floated >>>>>>>> away >>>>>>>> after being nuked but I didn't use the link at the very end of this >>>>>>>> post >>>>>>>> until now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And keep in mind if there was absolutely no radiation recorded at >>>>>>>> Ground >>>>>>>> Zero then that is a smoking gun too because there is radiation >>>>>>>> everywhere. >>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And don't give me any seismic readings bullshit because buildings >>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>> shake and shake and shake at a consistent rate if a tripod was >>>>>>>> bumped. >>>>>>>> Plus >>>>>>>> a bumped tripod does not explain why WCBS recorded a simultaneous >>>>>>>> EMP >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> why people started running at the exact same event. <G> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And to this very date NIST has never used their Cartoon Physics to >>>>>>>> explain >>>>>>>> why so much at the very bottom of the Twin Towers were left >>>>>>>> standing >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>> just standing but standing with survivors. <G> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And then why are their so many inconsistencies between real jets >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> Phantom Flight 175? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://911planeshoax.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now for the link that shows Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://smg.photobucket.com/user/youricarma/media/NineOneOne/GJS-WTC46.jpg.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> But no nuclear signatures. >>>> >>>> All you need for a "nuclear signature" is a sudden onset and you can >>>> see >>>> that when the North Tower starts shaking and shaking and shaking. DUH. >>>> >>> >>> But there was no nuclear signature. >> >> And where is your proof that you even know what a "nuclear signature" is? >> ROTFLMAO >> >> > > You have been told enough times on this NG what it is, if you don't > believe what has been posted, feel free to prove otherwise. Guess #1 you get two more tries before you are out.
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 17:29 -0500
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-04 18:42 -0400
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:22 -0500
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-05 07:22 -0400
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 19:59 -0400
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 02:40 -0500
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-05 08:00 -0400
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 10:48 -0500
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Link for Tony) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 03:28 -0500
Re: Rocky imagines nukes yet again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:53 +0000
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Link for Tony) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still an idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 15:10 -0500
Re: Rocky the stalker raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:03 +0000
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still an idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 23:02 +0100
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:04 -0500
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 18:46 +0100
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 12:56 -0500
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 20:04 +0100
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Michael gives me a laugh) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:18 -0500
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Link for Tony) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:21 +0200
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (answers 4 d Ediot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:19 -0500
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (answers 4 d Ediot & dmaster) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:16 -0500
Re: Rocky continues crazy raving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 00:08 +0000
Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-05 08:11 -0400
Re: Rocky continues crazy raving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:40 +0000
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 02:41 -0500
Re: Rocky thinks cameas are seismographs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:55 +0000
Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 11:43 -0400
Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 10:58 -0500
Re: Rocky's one wing delusion jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:59 +0000
Re: Rocky's one wing delusion "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 14:58 -0500
Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:17 -0500
Re: Rocky hammers K the Krazy "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:39 -0500
Re: Rocky spews more delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:04 +0000
Re: Rocky hammers the Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:18 -0500
Re: Rocky raves against reality again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:41 +0000
Re: Rocky hammers jimp again "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 14:29 -0500
Re: Rocky doesn't get it jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:06 +0000
Re: Rocky will run away from the TRUTH. Yes, again. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:00 +0200
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (k kaught in more lies) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:43 -0500
Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 10:08 -0500
Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 10:25 -0500
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 19:37 +0200
Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:45 +0000
csiph-web