Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #275122

Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Link for Tony)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/09/2015 09:28, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:msf99a$bmg$3@dont-email.me...
>> On 05/09/2015 16:48, Rocky wrote:
>>> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:7b13b459-d8cf-4d7d-aa13-33df781f08fd@googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>> I don't care what her link says, you tried to suggest that the bombs
>>>> were
>>>> able to vaporize the buildings without showing radiation because they
>>>> were
>>>> "neutron" bombs until someone pointed out to you that "neutron" bombs do
>>>> exactly the opposite.
>>>
>>> The real question is why don't you just listen to the person that knows
>>> the
>>> most?  Here, I'll give you the link again:
>>>
>>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I
>>>
>>> And don't forget what you said about the Naudet Brothers editing their
>>> video.  You said it was just a shadow but if that were true how could a
>>> smoke cloud make a square shadow?  And if that were true then why didn't
>>> Phantom Flight 11 make a shadow too?
>>>
>>> And regardless of what you say about the shadow Runrunner cutout in the
>>> North Tower was still too short for the wingspan of a 767
>>>
>>>
>>>> You still haven't provided any independent evidence that underground
>>>> nukes
>>>> can affect the surface without bursting through and sending dirt and
>>>> debris flying into the air.
>>>
>>> Oddly enough there is a video that shows an explosion when the nuke under
>>> WTC3 was detonated so maybe something did blast through after all.  <G>
>>>
>>>
>> Do please provide the link to that video, or is it another piece of
>> evidence that you have 'lost'.
>
> Jump to 44:25 of the following video to see an explosion about 12 seconds
> before the bottom section of the North Tower is converted to ultra fine dust
> with the exception of the part that was not able to be nuked.  BTW that
> explosion or just slightly before it coincides with an EMP recorded by WCBS.
>
> 9/11 Eyewitness rare unfiltered / unaltered amateur footage | What was NOT
> shown on TV
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k
>
> ********************
>
>
>>>> You argue that the "surviving walls" only survived because they were
>>>> outside the range of the "underground nukes," but the picture you keep
>>>> hawking shows a "surviving wall" right in the path of the underground
>>>> nuke.
>>>> (Look in the lower right corner.) I pointed this out to you once and you
>>>> responded; "That wall used to be taller" which misses the point
>>>> entirely.
>>>
>>> Most all of WTC4 was missed even though the nuke that vaporized the South
>>> Tower was detonated under WTC4.  But it might not have been planned that
>>> way
>>> or I'm sure they would have tried harder not to blow up part of Fiterman
>>> Hall when they nuked WTC7.
>>>
>>> *****  ORIGINAL POST BELOW *****
>>>
>>> Ok, I've recently been saying that buildings at Ground Zero floated away
>>> after being nuked but I didn't use the link at the very end of this post
>>> until now.
>>>
>>> And keep in mind if there was absolutely no radiation recorded at Ground
>>> Zero then that is a smoking gun too because there is radiation
>>> everywhere.
>>> <G>
>>>
>>> And don't give me any seismic readings bullshit because buildings don't
>>> just
>>> shake and shake and shake at a consistent rate if a tripod was bumped.
>>> Plus
>>> a bumped tripod does not explain why WCBS recorded a simultaneous EMP and
>>> why people started running at the exact same event.  <G>
>>>
>>> And to this very date NIST has never used their Cartoon Physics to
>>> explain
>>> why so much at the very bottom of the Twin Towers were left standing and
>>> not
>>> just standing but standing with survivors.  <G>
>>>
>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>> And then why are their so many inconsistencies between real jets and the
>>> Phantom Flight 175?
>>>
>>>    http://911planeshoax.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>> Now for the link that shows Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero
>>>
>>> http://smg.photobucket.com/user/youricarma/media/NineOneOne/GJS-WTC46.jpg.html
>>>
>
> Rocky
>
>


But no nuclear signatures.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 17:29 -0500
  Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-04 18:42 -0400
    Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:22 -0500
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-05 07:22 -0400
  Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 19:59 -0400
    Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 02:40 -0500
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-05 08:00 -0400
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 10:48 -0500
        Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
          Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero  (Link for Tony) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 03:28 -0500
            Re: Rocky imagines nukes yet again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:53 +0000
            Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Link for Tony) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
              Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still an idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 15:10 -0500
                Re: Rocky the stalker raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:03 +0000
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still an idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 23:02 +0100
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:04 -0500
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 18:46 +0100
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 12:56 -0500
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 20:04 +0100
            Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Michael gives me a laugh) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:18 -0500
            Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero  (Link for Tony) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:21 +0200
        Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (answers 4 d Ediot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:19 -0500
          Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (answers 4 d Ediot & dmaster) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:16 -0500
  Re: Rocky continues crazy raving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 00:08 +0000
    Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-05 08:11 -0400
      Re: Rocky continues crazy raving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:40 +0000
        Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 02:41 -0500
          Re: Rocky thinks cameas are seismographs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:55 +0000
        Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 11:43 -0400
          Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 10:58 -0500
            Re: Rocky's one wing delusion jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:59 +0000
              Re: Rocky's one wing delusion "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 14:58 -0500
          Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:17 -0500
            Re: Rocky hammers K the Krazy "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:39 -0500
              Re: Rocky spews more delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:04 +0000
              Re: Rocky hammers the Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:18 -0500
                Re: Rocky raves against reality again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:41 +0000
                Re: Rocky hammers jimp again "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 14:29 -0500
                Re: Rocky doesn't get it jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:06 +0000
                Re: Rocky will run away from the TRUTH. Yes, again. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:00 +0200
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (k kaught in more lies) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:43 -0500
          Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 10:08 -0500
    Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 10:25 -0500
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 19:37 +0200
      Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:45 +0000

csiph-web