Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still an idiot)

From	Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still an idiot)
Date	2015-09-06 23:02 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<msid1m$roe$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <ErqdnWWg8b2lk3bInZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <msf99a$bmg$3@dont-email.me> <B_-dnQPn8O_7ZHbInZ2dnUU7-N2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <msi5i3$2iq$3@dont-email.me> <xqednWH44q57AHHInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/09/2015 21:10, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:msi5i3$2iq$3@dont-email.me...
>> On 06/09/2015 09:28, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:msf99a$bmg$3@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 05/09/2015 16:48, Rocky wrote:
>>>>> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:7b13b459-d8cf-4d7d-aa13-33df781f08fd@googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't care what her link says, you tried to suggest that the bombs
>>>>>> were
>>>>>> able to vaporize the buildings without showing radiation because they
>>>>>> were
>>>>>> "neutron" bombs until someone pointed out to you that "neutron" bombs
>>>>>> do
>>>>>> exactly the opposite.
>>>>>
>>>>> The real question is why don't you just listen to the person that knows
>>>>> the
>>>>> most?  Here, I'll give you the link again:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
>>>>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I
>>>>>
>>>>> And don't forget what you said about the Naudet Brothers editing their
>>>>> video.  You said it was just a shadow but if that were true how could a
>>>>> smoke cloud make a square shadow?  And if that were true then why
>>>>> didn't
>>>>> Phantom Flight 11 make a shadow too?
>>>>>
>>>>> And regardless of what you say about the shadow Runrunner cutout in the
>>>>> North Tower was still too short for the wingspan of a 767
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> You still haven't provided any independent evidence that underground
>>>>>> nukes
>>>>>> can affect the surface without bursting through and sending dirt and
>>>>>> debris flying into the air.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oddly enough there is a video that shows an explosion when the nuke
>>>>> under
>>>>> WTC3 was detonated so maybe something did blast through after all.  <G>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Do please provide the link to that video, or is it another piece of
>>>> evidence that you have 'lost'.
>>>
>>> Jump to 44:25 of the following video to see an explosion about 12 seconds
>>> before the bottom section of the North Tower is converted to ultra fine
>>> dust
>>> with the exception of the part that was not able to be nuked.  BTW that
>>> explosion or just slightly before it coincides with an EMP recorded by
>>> WCBS.
>>>
>>> 9/11 Eyewitness rare unfiltered / unaltered amateur footage | What was
>>> NOT
>>> shown on TV
>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k
>>>
>>> ********************
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> You argue that the "surviving walls" only survived because they were
>>>>>> outside the range of the "underground nukes," but the picture you keep
>>>>>> hawking shows a "surviving wall" right in the path of the underground
>>>>>> nuke.
>>>>>> (Look in the lower right corner.) I pointed this out to you once and
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> responded; "That wall used to be taller" which misses the point
>>>>>> entirely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Most all of WTC4 was missed even though the nuke that vaporized the
>>>>> South
>>>>> Tower was detonated under WTC4.  But it might not have been planned
>>>>> that
>>>>> way
>>>>> or I'm sure they would have tried harder not to blow up part of
>>>>> Fiterman
>>>>> Hall when they nuked WTC7.
>>>>>
>>>>> *****  ORIGINAL POST BELOW *****
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I've recently been saying that buildings at Ground Zero floated
>>>>> away
>>>>> after being nuked but I didn't use the link at the very end of this
>>>>> post
>>>>> until now.
>>>>>
>>>>> And keep in mind if there was absolutely no radiation recorded at
>>>>> Ground
>>>>> Zero then that is a smoking gun too because there is radiation
>>>>> everywhere.
>>>>> <G>
>>>>>
>>>>> And don't give me any seismic readings bullshit because buildings don't
>>>>> just
>>>>> shake and shake and shake at a consistent rate if a tripod was bumped.
>>>>> Plus
>>>>> a bumped tripod does not explain why WCBS recorded a simultaneous EMP
>>>>> and
>>>>> why people started running at the exact same event.  <G>
>>>>>
>>>>> And to this very date NIST has never used their Cartoon Physics to
>>>>> explain
>>>>> why so much at the very bottom of the Twin Towers were left standing
>>>>> and
>>>>> not
>>>>> just standing but standing with survivors.  <G>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>
>>>>> And then why are their so many inconsistencies between real jets and
>>>>> the
>>>>> Phantom Flight 175?
>>>>>
>>>>>     http://911planeshoax.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
>>>>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>
>>>>> Now for the link that shows Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero
>>>>>
>>>>> http://smg.photobucket.com/user/youricarma/media/NineOneOne/GJS-WTC46.jpg.html
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> But no nuclear signatures.
>
> All you need for a "nuclear signature" is a sudden onset and you can see
> that when the North Tower starts shaking and shaking and shaking.  DUH.
>

But there was no nuclear signature.

> And the EMP recorded by an AM receiver operated by WCBS proves the shaking
> of the North Tower was caused by a small deep underground nuke.
>
> And the explosion recorded by a video might have been used to direct the
> nuke under WTC3 toward WTC1 since WTC2 had already been nuked.
>
> Plus the flash from the nuke under WTC3 could have taken place entirely
> underground as proven by the testing of other deep underground nukes.
>
> And do not forget there is plenty of supporting evidence that nukes had to
> be used on the Twin Towers because of how they floated away and what was
> left where the Twin Towers once stood.  <G>
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

Thread

Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 17:29 -0500
  Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-04 18:42 -0400
    Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:22 -0500
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-05 07:22 -0400
  Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 19:59 -0400
    Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 02:40 -0500
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-05 08:00 -0400
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 10:48 -0500
        Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
          Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero  (Link for Tony) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 03:28 -0500
            Re: Rocky imagines nukes yet again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:53 +0000
            Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Link for Tony) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
              Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still an idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 15:10 -0500
                Re: Rocky the stalker raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:03 +0000
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still an idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 23:02 +0100
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:04 -0500
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 18:46 +0100
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 12:56 -0500
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 20:04 +0100
            Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Michael gives me a laugh) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:18 -0500
            Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero  (Link for Tony) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:21 +0200
        Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (answers 4 d Ediot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:19 -0500
          Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (answers 4 d Ediot & dmaster) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:16 -0500
  Re: Rocky continues crazy raving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 00:08 +0000
    Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-05 08:11 -0400
      Re: Rocky continues crazy raving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:40 +0000
        Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 02:41 -0500
          Re: Rocky thinks cameas are seismographs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:55 +0000
        Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 11:43 -0400
          Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 10:58 -0500
            Re: Rocky's one wing delusion jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:59 +0000
              Re: Rocky's one wing delusion "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 14:58 -0500
          Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:17 -0500
            Re: Rocky hammers K the Krazy "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:39 -0500
              Re: Rocky spews more delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:04 +0000
              Re: Rocky hammers the Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:18 -0500
                Re: Rocky raves against reality again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:41 +0000
                Re: Rocky hammers jimp again "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 14:29 -0500
                Re: Rocky doesn't get it jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:06 +0000
                Re: Rocky will run away from the TRUTH. Yes, again. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:00 +0200
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (k kaught in more lies) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:43 -0500
          Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 10:08 -0500
    Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 10:25 -0500
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 19:37 +0200
      Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:45 +0000

csiph-web