Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #567621
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! |
| References | (3 earlier) <ndn8f0$bqk$1@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.1{7.02P.Seattle.2016}> <ndp51o$12e$4@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.2{0.19P.Seattle.2016}> <ndq89p$l4t$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| Message-ID | <Nk2My.1805$RE2.458@fx42.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | TeraNews.com |
| Date | 2016-04-03 02:01 -0400 |
On 04/03/2016 01:04 AM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> writes:
>
>> According to general relativity,
>> no path in spacetime can leave the singularity within a black hole;
>> so we humans can't see anything there.
>
> Yes, as I said before, all our information about the position/momentum of
> a black hole's singularity would have to come from outside the event
> horizon. So, information about its position/momentum are likely to be
> _less_ accurate than the Heisenberg limit. Which it certainly allows.
>
> So where is the violation of the HUP?
>
>> The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle puts _less_ restrictions
>> on the measurement of the singularity... which is right ?
>
>> They don't agree.
>
> I don't know what the heck you're trying to say here.
>
Rolf never knows what he's trying to say either...
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 12:58 -0500
p.e.a noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 13:47 -0700
Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-01 14:02 -0700
Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 16:20 -0500
Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-01 23:15 +0000
Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-02 01:49 +0000
Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 20:00 -0700
Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-02 19:03 +0000
Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 05:04 +0000
Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 02:01 -0400
Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 06:23 +0000
Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. xxein1@att.net - 2016-04-03 10:54 -0700
Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-03 14:05 -0700
Re: Loop Quantum Gravity. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-05 14:07 -0700
Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 22:31 -0400
Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-01 17:33 -0400
Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-02 12:26 -0400
Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-04 08:54 -0400
Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-03 20:13 -0500
csiph-web