Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #14126
| From | Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? |
| Date | 2026-01-31 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Mjm1b-eJN4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MiXYR-etP8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MjfCp-eFwl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MjfCp-eFwl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MjhkR-eGEX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, 31 Jan 2026 12:08, Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> wrote: > >Would you (the plural you - all those responding so far, and everyone >reading this who has voting power in Debian) prefer that Debian >considered "too-strictly-free" packaging a release-critical bug and >reason for rejection in NEW queue screening? > >My question was not which licens each individual developer would choose >but whether Debian as a project should consider copyleft licensing bad. >I understand and appreciate that we do not agree on what licensing is >ideal. > >Imagine a proposal was made to extend Debian Policy with a rule, that >packaging must be upstreamable - i.e. that packages licensed more >strictly free than that of the contained project must be *rejected* at >the NEW queue screening, and packages already in the archive with such >"too strictly free" licensing should¹ be either corrected or dropped. > I would not be for such a strict proposal. Though I could get behind an addition to policy like this: """ It's recommended to license the packaging work (i.e. the debian folder) under the same terms as upstream. This ensures that cherry-picked upstream patches do not cause a license violation. For instance, if a project has the following copyright stanza: Files: * Copyright: 2020 Alice Dev License: GPL-3 ... you might license the packaging work itself like this: Files: debian/* Copyright: 2026 Daniela Debian License: GPL-3 """ Might need better wording; ESL speaker here. Also, as (random) datapoint: AFAIK, the rust team, the GNOME team, the KDE team and the vim team already use said licensing. Not sure about the other teams. When I started contributing I was told to use this style. best, werdahias
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2026-01-30 15:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net> - 2026-01-30 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 12:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-01-30 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-01-30 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 10:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2026-01-31 12:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 12:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net> - 2026-01-31 17:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 18:00 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2026-01-31 20:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-02-02 16:20 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? "Andrea Pappacoda" <andrea@pappacoda.it> - 2026-02-03 15:10 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2026-02-04 10:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-02-04 18:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? "Andrea Pappacoda" <tachi@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 17:10 +0100
Is Packaging Copyrightable (was: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian?) Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-02-02 20:10 +0100
Re: Is Packaging Copyrightable Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2026-02-02 21:50 +0100
as any other metadata + code expression Question: Is Packaging Copyrightable Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@debian.org> - 2026-02-03 00:30 +0100
Re: Is Packaging Copyrightable Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2026-02-02 23:00 +0100
Re: Is Packaging Copyrightable Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-02-02 23:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Antoine Le Gonidec <vv221@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 20:00 +0100
csiph-web