Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #14115
| From | Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? |
| Date | 2026-01-30 17:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MiZHj-ev04-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MiXYR-etP8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Friday, January 30, 2026 6:04:44 AM Mountain Standard Time Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I appreciate that upstream authors may have reasons to choose different > licensing, and am open to relicense non-packaging parts (e.g. patches). > Sometimes I proactively license patches potential for upstream adoption > same as upstream, but generally I don't - patches are often arguably > too small to be copyright-protected, or might contain contributions > from multiple authors - in short, it is simpler for me to ensure that > the packaging parts are all DFSG-free than that they are all compliant > with upstream choice of licensing, and I see no need for the packaging > part to be compliant with upstream choice of licensing. I think it is generally best for the debian/* licensing to match the upstream licensing. Unless there is some compelling reason why it should be different (so far, I have never come across an example of such a reason), I think it should be the default behavior for Debian packaging. -- Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2026-01-30 15:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net> - 2026-01-30 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 12:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-01-30 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-01-30 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 10:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2026-01-31 12:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 12:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net> - 2026-01-31 17:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 18:00 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2026-01-31 20:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-02-02 16:20 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? "Andrea Pappacoda" <andrea@pappacoda.it> - 2026-02-03 15:10 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2026-02-04 10:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-02-04 18:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? "Andrea Pappacoda" <tachi@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 17:10 +0100
Is Packaging Copyrightable (was: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian?) Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-02-02 20:10 +0100
Re: Is Packaging Copyrightable Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2026-02-02 21:50 +0100
as any other metadata + code expression Question: Is Packaging Copyrightable Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@debian.org> - 2026-02-03 00:30 +0100
Re: Is Packaging Copyrightable Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2026-02-02 23:00 +0100
Re: Is Packaging Copyrightable Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-02-02 23:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Antoine Le Gonidec <vv221@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 20:00 +0100
csiph-web