Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #14113
| From | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? |
| Date | 2026-01-30 15:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MiXYR-etP8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi dear fellow Debian developers, When I package a project for inclusion into Debian, I commonly license my packaging work using a copyleft license¹. I appreciate that upstream authors may have reasons to choose different licensing, and am open to relicense non-packaging parts (e.g. patches). Sometimes I proactively license patches potential for upstream adoption same as upstream, but generally I don't - patches are often arguably too small to be copyright-protected, or might contain contributions from multiple authors - in short, it is simpler for me to ensure that the packaging parts are all DFSG-free than that they are all compliant with upstream choice of licensing, and I see no need for the packaging part to be compliant with upstream choice of licensing. My question here is: Am I doing a disservice to Debian? Do Debian already have a Policy about this? If not, should we add one? Personally I think not. I think that Debian is about DFSG, not about lowering politically to the lowest common denominator. What triggers me in asking this is that, as part of a recent NEW queue processing, this pattern of mine was noticed and questioned. I don't think that question is a relevant part of NEW queue processing, but instead of letting that being a discussion between me and that one helpful developer screening the package, or between me and the team, I consider it more appropriately a discussion in Debian in general. To clarify, I am not asking if copylef is more virtuous or a virus. Also, I am not asking if it is simpler to go with the flow. I am asking if it is bad for Debian to have licensing opinions, within the scope of DFSG. Kind regards, - Jonas ¹ Nowadays I mostly use GPL-3+ but that varies slightly. I don't mind elaborating on when I choose which license specifically, but consider such detalis unimportant for the topic of this email. -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2026-01-30 15:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net> - 2026-01-30 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 12:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-01-30 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-01-30 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 10:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2026-01-31 12:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 12:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net> - 2026-01-31 17:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 18:00 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2026-01-31 20:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-02-02 16:20 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? "Andrea Pappacoda" <andrea@pappacoda.it> - 2026-02-03 15:10 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2026-02-04 10:50 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-02-04 18:30 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? "Andrea Pappacoda" <tachi@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 17:10 +0100
Is Packaging Copyrightable (was: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian?) Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-02-02 20:10 +0100
Re: Is Packaging Copyrightable Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2026-02-02 21:50 +0100
as any other metadata + code expression Question: Is Packaging Copyrightable Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@debian.org> - 2026-02-03 00:30 +0100
Re: Is Packaging Copyrightable Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2026-02-02 23:00 +0100
Re: Is Packaging Copyrightable Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-02-02 23:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Antoine Le Gonidec <vv221@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 17:40 +0100
Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 20:00 +0100
csiph-web