Re: Was she looking for love ?

From	Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: Was she looking for love ?
Date	2018-10-03 09:01 -0600
Organization	FNVW
Message-ID	<MPG.361e879d772d531d989dc6@reader.albasani.net> (permalink)
References	(20 earlier) <pp2k75$14lo$5@gioia.aioe.org> <MPG.361e844e5329e69b989db6@reader.albasani.net> <pp2kuv$14lo$11@gioia.aioe.org> <MPG.361e864bc09d15e989dbf@reader.albasani.net> <pp2lcp$14lo$17@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <pp2lcp$14lo$17@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 10/3/2018 10:55 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <pp2kuv$14lo$11@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
> > @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> >> No. Your question *contained* the embedded assertion that Ford is a paid
> >> shill. Before it can be answered you *must* substantiate that k'lame.
> >> Because if in fact she is *not* a paid shill the question doesn't even
> >> discuss this universe!
> > 
> > Nice spi<SMACKAK00K!>
> You were challenged to support a claim that is part of the very premise 
> of your question. You have explicitly refused to substantiate that 
> claim. There's nothing more to be said ... unless of course you're 
> willing to substantiate your claim.

You snipped that part that made you look like an ass, answer my question 
that you are so afraid to answer.

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:51 +0000
  Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0600
    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:49 +0000
      Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:52 -0600
        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:47 +0000
          Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:57 -0600
            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 10:08 -0400
              Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:33 -0600
            Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:37 -0400
              Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:46 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:50 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:55 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:57 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 09:01 -0600

csiph-web