Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #210567

Re: Was she looking for love ?

From Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.checkmate
Subject Re: Was she looking for love ?
Date 2018-10-03 08:46 -0600
Organization FNVW
Message-ID <MPG.361e844e5329e69b989db6@reader.albasani.net> (permalink)
References (17 earlier) <pp0p5d$1of$3@dont-email.me> <MPG.361da49e3cd1b48989d88@reader.albasani.net> <pp13jd$1of$17@dont-email.me> <MPG.361e78ad618e29b0989d95@reader.albasani.net> <pp2k75$14lo$5@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <pp2k75$14lo$5@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 10/3/2018 9:57 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <pp13jd$1of$17@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> >> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:52:34 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <pp0p5d$1of$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> >>>> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 10:09:47 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <poumfc$at2$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> >>>>>> On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 05:30:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> Are you the FBI? Do you have proof? Do you always take the word of
> >>>>>>> a known Trump hating democrapper paid
> >>>>>> Proof?
> >>>>> You sa<SPANK>
> >>>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
> >>> You snipped the question that scares you to answer.
> >> You prove that Ford is being paid, *first*. *Then* we can discuss whatever
> >> question you wanted to burble at me.
> > Nope, I don't cave in to cheating lefty demands.
> 
> In what way is Nadegda, in asking you to back up claims that you make, 
> "cheating", koOktArd?

I asked a question firts that you libs always run from, she spun away 
and again refused to answer.

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:51 +0000
  Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0600
    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:49 +0000
      Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:52 -0600
        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:47 +0000
          Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:57 -0600
            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 10:08 -0400
              Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:33 -0600
            Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:37 -0400
              Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:46 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:50 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:55 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:57 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 09:01 -0600

csiph-web