Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #210585
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Date | 2018-10-03 10:57 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pp2lcp$14lo$17@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (20 earlier) <MPG.361e78ad618e29b0989d95@reader.albasani.net> <pp2k75$14lo$5@gioia.aioe.org> <MPG.361e844e5329e69b989db6@reader.albasani.net> <pp2kuv$14lo$11@gioia.aioe.org> <MPG.361e864bc09d15e989dbf@reader.albasani.net> |
On 10/3/2018 10:55 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pp2kuv$14lo$11@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> No. Your question *contained* the embedded assertion that Ford is a paid >> shill. Before it can be answered you *must* substantiate that k'lame. >> Because if in fact she is *not* a paid shill the question doesn't even >> discuss this universe! > > Nice spi<SMACKAK00K!> You were challenged to support a claim that is part of the very premise of your question. You have explicitly refused to substantiate that claim. There's nothing more to be said ... unless of course you're willing to substantiate your claim. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:51 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:49 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:52 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:57 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 10:08 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:33 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:37 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:46 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:50 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:55 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 09:01 -0600
csiph-web