Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.support.depression > #318521
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.support.depression, alt.usenet.kooks, alt.war.vietnam |
| Subject | Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" |
| Date | 2016-02-24 20:56 -0800 |
| Organization | Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31382972c7b45f3b98c8cc@news.altopia.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <nafdb9$11d7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <zn_yy.3107$yM2.2984@fx39.iad> <naklrg$1l3f$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.ydcjoijatm21m2@benson.localhost> <9dab31b51a44ffebca5a9c2978d534b3@dizum.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
In article <9dab31b51a44ffebca5a9c2978d534b3@dizum.com>, FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx says... > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.ydcjoijatm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > > > phase A minus phase B minus phase C > > For 120 volts and using your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, > gives 240 volts with the same phase angle as Phase A. Which is wrong > since it violates Watt's Law. > > For 169.71 volts and using your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, > gives 339.415 volts with the same phase angle as Phase A. Which is > wrong since it violates Watt's Law. > > You'll get right on describing exactly how you're connecting across > all three phases to achieve voltage doubling without shorting > everything out, Moron. > > SPNAK! Wanna sound smarter? Shut the fuck up. Everybody's spanked you, yet you still continue to blather. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
Back to alt.support.depression | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-22 07:35 -0800
Re:LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Doug Laidlaw <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> - 2016-02-23 03:35 +1100
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-23 06:53 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Doug Laidlaw <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> - 2016-02-25 03:31 +1100
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 11:49 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 21:42 +0100
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 20:56 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 23:59 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 21:07 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 00:23 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 21:51 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-25 12:03 -0600
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:04 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 07:00 +0100
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 06:50 +0100
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 01:21 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 17:49 +0100
TROLLED K0ok IS TROLLED... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:01 -0500
TROLLED K0ok IS TROLLED... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:01 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 04:15 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-24 09:21 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "David" <dd@daviddw.com> - 2016-02-24 17:24 -0600
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Fred Oinka <stardusthevn@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 12:00 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "David" <dd@daviddw.com> - 2016-02-24 07:13 -0600
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "David" <dd@daviddw.com> - 2016-02-23 17:53 -0600
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-24 09:22 -0800
csiph-web