Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.war.vietnam > #90846
| From | Doug Laidlaw <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.war.vietnam, alt.usenet.kooks, alt.support.depression |
| Subject | Re:LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" |
| Date | 2016-02-23 03:35 +1100 |
| Organization | news.aioe.org |
| Message-ID | <nafdb9$11d7$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <hVFyy.50949$_w2.4906@fx05.iad> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
"Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> Wrote in message: > The origin of the expression is not known. Conventional wisdom has long > fancied it to be the use of kippers (pungent smoked fish) to train > hounds to follow a scent, or to divert them from the correct route when > hunting; however, modern linguistic research suggests that the term was > probably invented in 1807 by English polemicist William Cobbett, > referring to one occasion on which he had supposedly used a kipper to > divert hounds from chasing a hare, which was never an actual practice of > hunters. The phrase was later borrowed to provide a formal name for the > logical fallacy and literary device. > > *The more you know* > > I had read that it arose from fox hunting, but back then, Wikipedia said that all attempts to connect the limerick with Limerick in Ireland had failed. Now, wikipedia says the opposite. There are "history revisionists," who like to have a second look at history. Every American has heard of George Washington's little hatchet. The revisionists say that there were no cherry trees on his father's property. The story was the invention of an early biographer. Doug. --
Back to alt.war.vietnam | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-22 07:35 -0800
Re:LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Doug Laidlaw <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> - 2016-02-23 03:35 +1100
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-23 06:53 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Jack G." <j.granade@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-23 07:49 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Doug Laidlaw <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> - 2016-02-25 03:31 +1100
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 11:49 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 21:42 +0100
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 20:56 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 23:59 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 21:07 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 00:23 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 21:51 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-24 21:56 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-25 12:03 -0600
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:04 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Jack G." <j.granade@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-25 11:50 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 07:00 +0100
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-24 22:13 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 06:50 +0100
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 01:21 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 17:49 +0100
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Jack G." <j.granade@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-25 09:33 -0800
TROLLED K0ok IS TROLLED... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:01 -0500
TROLLED K0ok IS TROLLED... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:01 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-24 21:48 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 04:15 -0500
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-24 09:21 -0800
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "David" <dd@daviddw.com> - 2016-02-24 17:24 -0600
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "David" <dd@daviddw.com> - 2016-02-23 17:53 -0600
Re: LOGICAL FALLACY EXPLAINED: WOT IS A "RED HERRING" "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-24 09:22 -0800
csiph-web