Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #82006
| From | Gianluca Renzi <icjtqr@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot, linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.ports.arm |
| Subject | Re: What to do with d-i on armel? |
| Date | 2024-03-04 07:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Ie9Gp-eiKN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HTJOx-1x6F-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HUpuq-1X6H-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <HUsLD-1ZKr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ie4x3-efnx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
The same here. We never used the d-i but we are using Debian systems (kernel and root file system) as daily bases of our line of products embedded systems. Hundred of thousands of boards are using Debian since Debian Lenny 5.0. From armel to armhf 32 bit systems. So a drop of the armel and/or armhf will force us to a very complicated rearrangement of our build systems. Please don't do that if you can. Best regards Il lun 4 mar 2024, 01:34 Martin <debacle@debian.org> ha scritto: > On 2024-01-09 22:19, Martin wrote: > > On 2024-01-09 19:56, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > >> though. Any armel users out there? :-) > > > > My employer uses Debian on armel, but not d-i :-) > > I should add: We never used d-i on armel and have our own kernel. > Most other stuff is plain Debian, though. > >
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-07 23:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 20:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-09 23:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 01:40 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Gianluca Renzi <icjtqr@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 07:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2024-03-03 20:40 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Ástor Ayllón Lázaro <thosleaf@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 22:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-10 09:00 +0100
Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:00 +0100
Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-01-10 10:50 +0100
Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-10 11:50 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2024-01-19 18:00 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-19 18:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-03 21:10 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:30 +0100
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2024-03-09 08:00 +0100
csiph-web