Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #267594

Re: Orphaned Inode Problem

From "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Orphaned Inode Problem
Date 2024-02-19 18:40 +0100
Message-ID <I9fMt-bf3P-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <I9drj-bdO4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I9drj-bdO4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <I9fCO-bf0J-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 02/19/2024 12:20 PM, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:02:10AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>> I am running up to date Bookworm on my Debian platform:
>>
>> Processor 	AMD FX(tm)-8320 Eight-Core Processor
>> Memory 	8026MB (5267MB used)
>> Machine Type 	Desktop
>> Operating System 	Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
>>
>> I have been plagued with orphaned inodes. Last night the problem cane to a
>> head. When I reboot the computer, after an orphaned inode incident created
>> stop, it got as far as the user login. After the return I got the Windows
>> infamous blue screen. Restarting produced the same problem.
>>
>> Fortunately, I have another SSD used to test Bookworm, before updating on
>> the SSD that is having the problem. I can access the problem drive and am in
>> the process of backing up files.
>>
>> I ran sudo e2fsck -f/dev/sdc1 and got:
>>
>> Script started on 2024-02-19 08:15:52-05:00 [TERM="xterm-256color"
>> TTY="/dev/pts/0" COLUMNS="100" LINES="24"]
>> [?2004h(base) ]0;comp@AbNormal:
>> ~comp@AbNormal:~$ sudo e2fsck -f
>> /dev/sdc1lcaomosudo e2fsck -f /dev/sdc1
>> [?2004l
>> [sudo] password for comp:
>> e2fsck 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023)
>> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
>> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
>> /lost+found not found.  Create<y>? yes
>> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
>> Pass 5: Checking group summary information
>>
>> /dev/sdc1: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>> /dev/sdc1: 7982363/121577472 files (0.3% non-contiguous),
>> 421959365/486307328 blocks
>> [?2004h(base) ]0;comp@AbNormal:
>> ~comp@AbNormal:~$ [?2004l
>>
>> Comments and suggestions will be appreciated.
> This session doesn't show anything to worry about. As far as fsck
> is concerned, the file system looks clean. Back up its contents as
> quickly as you can and treat the disk with suspicion. There are
> other candidate suspects for file system corruption (flaky power
> supply, software doing silly things, kernel bugs, loose cables),
> but the disk would be the pirmary.
>
> Cheers
Thanks for he reply. It's somewhat reassuring.

According to my logs the box had its' last major  last upgrade in 2014, 
so I shouldn't be too surprised.

My backup is underweight and should be done sometime tomorrow.  I have a 
2 TB HDD I'm going to use for the new install.

-- 
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.
https://insilicochemistry.net
(614)312-7528 (c)
Skype:  smolnar1

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Orphaned Inode Problem "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-02-19 16:10 +0100
  Re: Orphaned Inode Problem <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-19 18:30 +0100
    Re: Orphaned Inode Problem "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-02-19 18:40 +0100
      Re: Orphaned Inode Problem <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-19 18:50 +0100
      Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-02-21 12:10 +0100
        Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2024-02-21 14:20 +0100
          Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-02-21 17:20 +0100
            Re: Orphaned Inode Problem <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-22 07:10 +0100
            Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2024-02-22 08:50 +0100
              Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-02-22 11:30 +0100
          Re: Orphaned Inode Problem gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-22 05:30 +0100
        Re: Orphaned Inode Problem David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-21 19:20 +0100
          Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Gremlin <scott-andrews@columbus.rr.com> - 2024-02-21 22:40 +0100
    Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2024-02-19 20:20 +0100
      red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-20 01:50 +0100
        Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2024-02-20 02:20 +0100
          Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-20 02:30 +0100
            Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2024-02-20 03:10 +0100
              Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-20 10:30 +0100
                Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 14:50 +0100
            Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 04:10 +0100
              Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-20 04:20 +0100
                Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 04:40 +0100
        Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode  Problem) gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 03:40 +0100
        Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode  Problem) jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2024-02-20 04:40 +0100
          Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2024-02-20 11:00 +0100
            Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2024-02-20 11:20 +0100

csiph-web