Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #267674
| From | gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Orphaned Inode Problem |
| Date | 2024-02-22 05:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Ia8SB-bMob-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <I9drj-bdO4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <I9fCO-bf0J-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I9fMt-bf3P-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I9SEa-bCKy-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <I9UFX-bDUC-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2/21/24 08:17, Henning Follmann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 12:00:17PM +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> did you take a look at the smartctl output? >> >> Somewhere I read, for maintainance of an SSD all it's cells should be read >> from time to time like this >> >> sudo dd if=/dev/DEVICE of=/dev/null bs=8M status=progress > > Where did you read that? That seems like a huge waste of time. > >> >> where device is something like sda or nvme0n1, especially if it was switched >> off for a longer period. At least, it shows the current read performance of >> the device. >> An SSD should regularly be trimmed, if in use. This is to assist it's wear >> leveling process. >> > If you should manually kick off trim is a hotly debated issue. > It mainly depends on the use of the drive. > In most cases however do not alter any of how the system was install by > your friendly installer. > > That actually might be a good idea, as it will force a read of everything, which will trigger a fixit it for any cell that does read right on the first try. OTOH, my pi's only get powered down for maintenance, so they've got lots of spare time to do their thing when you are not looking, And i've not lost a pi u-sd in quite a few years. So even though the system, with all the trash collected over a decade might amount to 10G's, they have 64G to play with. I must be doing something right. >> What's your opinion? > How much time do you have :) > > > -H > > > Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET. -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. - Louis D. Brandeis
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Orphaned Inode Problem "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-02-19 16:10 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-19 18:30 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-02-19 18:40 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-19 18:50 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-02-21 12:10 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2024-02-21 14:20 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-02-21 17:20 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-22 07:10 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2024-02-22 08:50 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-02-22 11:30 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-22 05:30 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-21 19:20 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Gremlin <scott-andrews@columbus.rr.com> - 2024-02-21 22:40 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2024-02-19 20:20 +0100
red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-20 01:50 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2024-02-20 02:20 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-20 02:30 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2024-02-20 03:10 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-20 10:30 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 14:50 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 04:10 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-20 04:20 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 04:40 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 03:40 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2024-02-20 04:40 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2024-02-20 11:00 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2024-02-20 11:20 +0100
csiph-web