Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #267594
| From | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Orphaned Inode Problem |
| Date | 2024-02-19 18:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <I9fMt-bf3P-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <I9drj-bdO4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I9drj-bdO4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <I9fCO-bf0J-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 02/19/2024 12:20 PM, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:02:10AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: >> I am running up to date Bookworm on my Debian platform: >> >> Processor AMD FX(tm)-8320 Eight-Core Processor >> Memory 8026MB (5267MB used) >> Machine Type Desktop >> Operating System Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) >> >> I have been plagued with orphaned inodes. Last night the problem cane to a >> head. When I reboot the computer, after an orphaned inode incident created >> stop, it got as far as the user login. After the return I got the Windows >> infamous blue screen. Restarting produced the same problem. >> >> Fortunately, I have another SSD used to test Bookworm, before updating on >> the SSD that is having the problem. I can access the problem drive and am in >> the process of backing up files. >> >> I ran sudo e2fsck -f/dev/sdc1 and got: >> >> Script started on 2024-02-19 08:15:52-05:00 [TERM="xterm-256color" >> TTY="/dev/pts/0" COLUMNS="100" LINES="24"] >> [?2004h(base) ]0;comp@AbNormal: >> ~[01;32mcomp@AbNormal[00m:[01;34m~[00m$ sudo e2fsck -f >> /dev/sdc1lcaomo[Ksudo e2fsck -f /dev/sdc1 >> [?2004l >> [sudo] password for comp: >> e2fsck 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023) >> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes >> Pass 2: Checking directory structure >> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity >> /lost+found not found. Create<y>? yes >> Pass 4: Checking reference counts >> Pass 5: Checking group summary information >> >> /dev/sdc1: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***** >> /dev/sdc1: 7982363/121577472 files (0.3% non-contiguous), >> 421959365/486307328 blocks >> [?2004h(base) ]0;comp@AbNormal: >> ~[01;32mcomp@AbNormal[00m:[01;34m~[00m$ [?2004l >> >> Comments and suggestions will be appreciated. > This session doesn't show anything to worry about. As far as fsck > is concerned, the file system looks clean. Back up its contents as > quickly as you can and treat the disk with suspicion. There are > other candidate suspects for file system corruption (flaky power > supply, software doing silly things, kernel bugs, loose cables), > but the disk would be the pirmary. > > Cheers Thanks for he reply. It's somewhat reassuring. According to my logs the box had its' last major last upgrade in 2014, so I shouldn't be too surprised. My backup is underweight and should be done sometime tomorrow. I have a 2 TB HDD I'm going to use for the new install. -- Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. https://insilicochemistry.net (614)312-7528 (c) Skype: smolnar1
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Orphaned Inode Problem "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-02-19 16:10 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-19 18:30 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-02-19 18:40 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-19 18:50 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-02-21 12:10 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2024-02-21 14:20 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-02-21 17:20 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-22 07:10 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2024-02-22 08:50 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-02-22 11:30 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-22 05:30 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-21 19:20 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Gremlin <scott-andrews@columbus.rr.com> - 2024-02-21 22:40 +0100
Re: Orphaned Inode Problem Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2024-02-19 20:20 +0100
red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-20 01:50 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2024-02-20 02:20 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-20 02:30 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2024-02-20 03:10 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-20 10:30 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 14:50 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 04:10 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-20 04:20 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 04:40 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-20 03:40 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2024-02-20 04:40 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2024-02-20 11:00 +0100
Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem) Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2024-02-20 11:20 +0100
csiph-web