Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #266783

Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package

Show all headers | View raw

On 1/30/24 1:41 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +0100, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
>> Unpacking marco-common (1.24.1-3) over (1.20.3-1) ...
>> .[1mdpkg:.[0m error processing archive
>> /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-S65GMD/8-marco-common_1.24.1-3_all.deb (--unpack):
>>   trying to overwrite
>> '/usr/share/themes/Gorilla/metacity-1/metacity-theme-1.xml', which is also
>> in package gnome-themes-more 0.9.0.deb0.8
> 
> These two packages can't coexist, so you're going to have to pick
> one to get rid of.
> 
> I did an "apt-cache show marco", and it's a window manager intended
> to be used by MATE.
> 
> I did "apt-cache show gnome-themes-more" and it doesn't exist in
> Debian 12 at all.  It must have been removed at some point, or else
> it came from a third party source.  (That "*deb0.8" version string
> looks a little odd to me, too.)
> 
> So... figure out which of these two packages you can live without,
> get rid of it, and then retry the upgrade.
> 
> Two packages both trying to supply the same file, without a Conflicts:
> line or something equivalent, should be considered a bug, if they're
> both Debian packages.  If one of them's third-party, then of course
> all bets are off.
> 
> 

Thank you. I removed gnome-themes-more as I mostly use MATE. (Did not 
check whether Gnome would suffer by any means :-)

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-30 13:30 +0100
  Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
    Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100
  Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
    Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100
    Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-02-01 12:20 +0100
      Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-01 15:10 +0100
        Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? skoric@uns.ac.rs - 2024-02-01 16:40 +0100
          Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-01 16:50 +0100
            Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? skoric@uns.ac.rs - 2024-02-01 18:10 +0100
              Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-02 21:00 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-02-02 21:20 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-02-03 12:40 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-03 12:50 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2024-02-03 04:10 +0100
  Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
    Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100

csiph-web