Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #266839

Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go?

Show all headers | View raw

> Am 01.02.2024 schrieb Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs>:
>
>> This time I was puzzled when noticed that Synaptic installed lots of
>> amd64 packages even though my system is i386.
>
> Run
> uname -a
> lscpu
>
> and post it here.
>
> If your system is i386 only, amd64 software can't run on it.
> Remove that architecture from dpkg.
>
>

uname -a
Linux localhost 5.10.0-27-686 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.205-2 (2023-12-31) i686
GNU/Linux

lscpu
Architecture:                       i686
CPU op-mode(s):                     32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order:                         Little Endian
Address sizes:                      36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
CPU(s):                             2
On-line CPU(s) list:                0,1
Thread(s) per core:                 1
Core(s) per socket:                 2
Socket(s):                          1
Vendor ID:                          GenuineIntel
CPU family:                         6
Model:                              23
Model name:                         Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU       T4500 
@ 2.30
                                    GHz
Stepping:                           10
CPU MHz:                            1316.130
CPU max MHz:                        2300.0000
CPU min MHz:                        1200.0000
BogoMIPS:                           4588.77
L1d cache:                          64 KiB
L1i cache:                          64 KiB
L2 cache:                           1 MiB
Vulnerability Gather data sampling: Not affected
Vulnerability Itlb multihit:        KVM: Mitigation: VMX unsupported
Vulnerability L1tf:                 Vulnerable
Vulnerability Mds:                  Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers
attempted, no
                                    microcode; SMT disabled
Vulnerability Meltdown:             Vulnerable
Vulnerability Mmio stale data:      Unknown: No mitigations
Vulnerability Retbleed:             Not affected
Vulnerability Spec rstack overflow: Not affected
Vulnerability Spec store bypass:    Vulnerable
Vulnerability Spectre v1:           Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers
and __u
                                    ser pointer sanitization
Vulnerability Spectre v2:           Mitigation; Retpolines, STIBP
disabled, RSB
                                    filling, PBRSB-eIBRS Not affected
Vulnerability Srbds:                Not affected
Vulnerability Tsx async abort:      Not affected
Flags:                              fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8
apic sep
                                    mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush
dts acpi
                                     mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht tm pbe nx lm
constant_
                                    tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts cpuid
aperfmperf p
                                    ni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl est tm2 ssse3
cx16
                                    xtpr pdcm xsave lahf_lm dtherm

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-30 13:30 +0100
  Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
    Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100
  Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
    Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100
    Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-02-01 12:20 +0100
      Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-01 15:10 +0100
        Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? skoric@uns.ac.rs - 2024-02-01 16:40 +0100
          Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-01 16:50 +0100
            Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? skoric@uns.ac.rs - 2024-02-01 18:10 +0100
              Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-02 21:00 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-02-02 21:20 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-02-03 12:40 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-03 12:50 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2024-02-03 04:10 +0100
  Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
    Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100

csiph-web