Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #266920
| From | Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? |
| Date | 2024-02-03 12:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <I3mxj-7ApD-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <I2Hkt-767d-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <I2Hu9-76aB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <I2IJA-777a-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <I37RE-7qX5-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <I38aZ-7riC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2/2/24 9:10 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> >>> I am not sure what do you mean by "install that architecture". I have >>> been using i386 versions of Debian, and I do not plan to reinstall it >>> now just because the CPU may allow that. > > At some point, you will have to make a decision. i386 is going to stop > being supported sooner or later. > > Yeah, I know that. Until then I will try to get the most out of this i386 installation as-is. In any case, I managed to get rid of some 250+ amd64 packages that came with pretty useless wine (5.0.3-3) installation from the bullseye repo. After deinstalling wine & related software (in Synaptic), I ran apt-get update, apt-get upgrade, and apt autoremove. It freed cca 1GB. After reboot, all was clean, so I decided to go with wine via WineHQ. I followed their published procedure for bullseye installation, and after a while it ended up with wine version 9, which for now seems functional. Will update the list in days to come ... Misko
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-30 13:30 +0100
Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100
Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100
Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-02-01 12:20 +0100
Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-01 15:10 +0100
Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? skoric@uns.ac.rs - 2024-02-01 16:40 +0100
Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-01 16:50 +0100
Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? skoric@uns.ac.rs - 2024-02-01 18:10 +0100
Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-02 21:00 +0100
Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-02-02 21:20 +0100
Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-02-03 12:40 +0100
Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-03 12:50 +0100
Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2024-02-03 04:10 +0100
Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100
csiph-web