Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #266784

Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package

Show all headers | View raw

On 1/30/24 1:40 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
> /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-S65GMD/8-marco-common_1.24.1-3_all.deb (--unpack):
>>    trying to overwrite
>> '/usr/share/themes/Gorilla/metacity-1/metacity-theme-1.xml', which is
>> also in package gnome-themes-more 0.9.0.deb0.8
> 
> Where do you get 'gnome-themes-more' from? At least as far as I can tell
> without more digging, it isn't in current stable or testing.
> 
> It *is* available on archive.debian.org and snapshot.debian.org, with
> that version number, but based on the timestamps it doesn't seem to have
> been updated since 2010.
> 

Dunno ... probably it became orphaned after upgrading from some previous 
releases. I used apt-forktracer to get rid of some packages before 
upgrading to bullseye, but many packages were still listed there. I was 
cautious and did not want to remove all of those just like that ...

> 
> My first default would be to remove gnome-themes-more (possibly with
> apt, possibly directly with dpkg), then try the '--fix-broken' step
> again.
> 
> Assuming that works, I'd then follow it up by repeating the full-upgrade
> step just to make sure, and then after that - if I really wanted
> gnome-themes-more - try to reinstall it (preferably using an updated
> package, if you can get your hands on one).
> 

Thanks for advice. I tried to remove that package with apt at first, to 
no avail, but dpkg was successful. Then the '--fix-broken' step and the 
full-upgrade step performed without errors.

Misko

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-30 13:30 +0100
  Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
    Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100
  Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
    Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100
    Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-02-01 12:20 +0100
      Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-01 15:10 +0100
        Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? skoric@uns.ac.rs - 2024-02-01 16:40 +0100
          Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-01 16:50 +0100
            Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? skoric@uns.ac.rs - 2024-02-01 18:10 +0100
              Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-02 21:00 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-02-02 21:20 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-02-03 12:40 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-02-03 12:50 +0100
                Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go? Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2024-02-03 04:10 +0100
  Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2024-01-30 13:50 +0100
    Re: apt full-upgrade failed at marco-common package Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs> - 2024-01-31 00:50 +0100

csiph-web