Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #13470
| From | Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Lack of replies |
| Date | 2024-01-04 16:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HSxFL-LqJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HSd4l-xZ2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HSejL-yDv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HSxmp-KZ5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2024-01-04 15:54:28 +0100 (+0100), Daniel Gröber wrote: [...] > Just to make sure I understand the constraints: we can determine > at sending time whether a particular domain is going to cause > trouble or not, right? If so could this rewrite scheme be applied > only for recipients where it's absolutely necessary? [...] Unfortunately no. It *used* to be a popular assumption that you could look at the published DKIM/DMARC policies for a given address and determine whether you can safely put them in the From header, but that changed recently when Gmail decided to treat messages from its own users more strictly than the policy it publishes for them in DNS. And since Gmail does custom domain hosting too, you can't simply limit the workaround to treating their well-known domain specially. Given its popularity (near ubiquity) as a freemail provider these days, telling users they'll have to get an address somewhere else to interact with the BTS is unlikely to end well either. -- Jeremy Stanley
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Lack of replies Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> - 2023-12-29 23:50 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-12-30 11:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> - 2024-01-02 19:40 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-02 20:30 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2024-01-03 04:10 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-03 18:20 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-03 19:40 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Daniel Gröber <dxld@darkboxed.org> - 2024-01-04 16:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-04 16:20 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-01-04 16:20 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Daniel Gröber <dxld@darkboxed.org> - 2024-01-04 17:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-01-04 17:30 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-04 18:10 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-04 16:30 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-04 17:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Michael Neuffer <neuffer@neuffer.com> - 2024-01-03 06:10 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-03 18:10 +0100
csiph-web