Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #13465
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Lack of replies |
| Date | 2024-01-03 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HSd4l-xZ2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HQtPX-gZdC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <HRRQd-kBh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HRSCC-l7x-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <HRZNL-prU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On January 3, 2024 2:55:35 AM UTC, Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> wrote: >>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> writes: > > > Scott> Alternatively, BTS users that are interested in others > Scott> getting their emails might be better off posting from a > Scott> domain that doesn't have a DMARC policy that's designed to be > Scott> used for domains that send only transactional email (i.e. no > Scott> human users). It's working fine for me. > >Would including a warning about the domain you are sending from be more >tractable as an improvement than SRS-style header rewriting? >(This directed more at people who know the BTS code). > >At least people could be warned that because of the domain they send >from their mail might not get through. > My guess is that such a warning email (which is the only way we'd have to do it) would also cause a lot of complaints. Ultimately, I think we (for some value of we that doesn't include me doing the work) will need to have the BTS send all emails from bugs.debian.org role addresses and not use the sender's email in From anymore. Scott K
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Lack of replies Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> - 2023-12-29 23:50 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-12-30 11:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> - 2024-01-02 19:40 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-02 20:30 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2024-01-03 04:10 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-03 18:20 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-03 19:40 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Daniel Gröber <dxld@darkboxed.org> - 2024-01-04 16:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-04 16:20 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-01-04 16:20 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Daniel Gröber <dxld@darkboxed.org> - 2024-01-04 17:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-01-04 17:30 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-04 18:10 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-04 16:30 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-04 17:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Michael Neuffer <neuffer@neuffer.com> - 2024-01-03 06:10 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-03 18:10 +0100
csiph-web