Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.project > #13463

Re: Lack of replies

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

By far most users in all likelihood do not know that something like even DMARC exists.

Do not discount them just because you know and can act accordingly.

Cheers
    Mike


Am 2. Januar 2024 20:10:27 MEZ schrieb Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>:
>
>
>On January 2, 2024 6:04:18 PM UTC, Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> wrote:
>>On Friday, December 29, 2023 2:18:41 P.M. CST Steven Robbins wrote:
>>
>>
>>> In the case of the BTS: it used to email me but that broke a couple years
>>> ago and apparently it is hard to fix.  So currently a class of us don't get
>>> email from any bug reports.
>>
>>Andrey Rakhmatullin asked "what is that class?".  
>>
>>It's unclear to me.  From the last discussion [1], it seems like it should be 
>>everyone.  Maybe it is everyone whose mail infrastructure looks at DMARC [2]?
>>
>>I think Sébastien Noel's 2021 note to the bug report is germane to this 
>>discussion:
>>
>>"""
>>Same observation here:
>>DMARC aggregate reports notifies me that emails sends to the BTS
>>are not delivered to the final recipient.
>>
>>I should not be surprised anymore if bugreports are left un-answered,
>>maintainers are simply not getting notification...
>>
>>Since the last comment of this bug, 4 months have passed and no 
>>reaction.
>>I suspect that nobody recieved the last email, and my guts tell me
>>that i'm writing to /dev/null rigth now :(
>>
>>Without a working BTS, i'm wondering :
>>Is the project still interested by users' feedback ?
>>"""
>>
>>
>>[1]  https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/09/msg00273.html
>>[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754809
>>
>
>Alternatively, BTS users that are interested in others getting their emails might be better off posting from a domain that doesn't have a DMARC policy that's designed to be used for domains that send only transactional email (i.e. no human users).  It's working fine for me.
>
>Scott K
>

Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Lack of replies Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> - 2023-12-29 23:50 +0100
  Re: Lack of replies Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-12-30 11:00 +0100
  Re: Lack of replies Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> - 2024-01-02 19:40 +0100
    Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-02 20:30 +0100
      Re: Lack of replies Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2024-01-03 04:10 +0100
        Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-03 18:20 +0100
          Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-03 19:40 +0100
          Re: Lack of replies Daniel Gröber <dxld@darkboxed.org> - 2024-01-04 16:00 +0100
            Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-04 16:20 +0100
            Re: Lack of replies Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-01-04 16:20 +0100
              Re: Lack of replies Daniel Gröber <dxld@darkboxed.org> - 2024-01-04 17:00 +0100
                Re: Lack of replies Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-01-04 17:30 +0100
                Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-04 18:10 +0100
            Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-04 16:30 +0100
              Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-04 17:00 +0100
      Re: Lack of replies Michael Neuffer <neuffer@neuffer.com> - 2024-01-03 06:10 +0100
        Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-03 18:10 +0100

csiph-web