Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.project > #13461

Re: Lack of replies

From Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.project
Subject Re: Lack of replies
Date 2024-01-02 20:30 +0100
Message-ID <HRSCC-l7x-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <HQtPX-gZdC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <HRRQd-kBh-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On January 2, 2024 6:04:18 PM UTC, Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> wrote:
>On Friday, December 29, 2023 2:18:41 P.M. CST Steven Robbins wrote:
>
>
>> In the case of the BTS: it used to email me but that broke a couple years
>> ago and apparently it is hard to fix.  So currently a class of us don't get
>> email from any bug reports.
>
>Andrey Rakhmatullin asked "what is that class?".  
>
>It's unclear to me.  From the last discussion [1], it seems like it should be 
>everyone.  Maybe it is everyone whose mail infrastructure looks at DMARC [2]?
>
>I think Sébastien Noel's 2021 note to the bug report is germane to this 
>discussion:
>
>"""
>Same observation here:
>DMARC aggregate reports notifies me that emails sends to the BTS
>are not delivered to the final recipient.
>
>I should not be surprised anymore if bugreports are left un-answered,
>maintainers are simply not getting notification...
>
>Since the last comment of this bug, 4 months have passed and no 
>reaction.
>I suspect that nobody recieved the last email, and my guts tell me
>that i'm writing to /dev/null rigth now :(
>
>Without a working BTS, i'm wondering :
>Is the project still interested by users' feedback ?
>"""
>
>
>[1]  https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/09/msg00273.html
>[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754809
>

Alternatively, BTS users that are interested in others getting their emails might be better off posting from a domain that doesn't have a DMARC policy that's designed to be used for domains that send only transactional email (i.e. no human users).  It's working fine for me.

Scott K

Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Lack of replies Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> - 2023-12-29 23:50 +0100
  Re: Lack of replies Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-12-30 11:00 +0100
  Re: Lack of replies Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> - 2024-01-02 19:40 +0100
    Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-02 20:30 +0100
      Re: Lack of replies Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2024-01-03 04:10 +0100
        Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-03 18:20 +0100
          Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-03 19:40 +0100
          Re: Lack of replies Daniel Gröber <dxld@darkboxed.org> - 2024-01-04 16:00 +0100
            Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-04 16:20 +0100
            Re: Lack of replies Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-01-04 16:20 +0100
              Re: Lack of replies Daniel Gröber <dxld@darkboxed.org> - 2024-01-04 17:00 +0100
                Re: Lack of replies Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-01-04 17:30 +0100
                Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-04 18:10 +0100
            Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-04 16:30 +0100
              Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-04 17:00 +0100
      Re: Lack of replies Michael Neuffer <neuffer@neuffer.com> - 2024-01-03 06:10 +0100
        Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-03 18:10 +0100

csiph-web