Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #13461
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Lack of replies |
| Date | 2024-01-02 20:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HRSCC-l7x-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HQtPX-gZdC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <HRRQd-kBh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On January 2, 2024 6:04:18 PM UTC, Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> wrote: >On Friday, December 29, 2023 2:18:41 P.M. CST Steven Robbins wrote: > > >> In the case of the BTS: it used to email me but that broke a couple years >> ago and apparently it is hard to fix. So currently a class of us don't get >> email from any bug reports. > >Andrey Rakhmatullin asked "what is that class?". > >It's unclear to me. From the last discussion [1], it seems like it should be >everyone. Maybe it is everyone whose mail infrastructure looks at DMARC [2]? > >I think Sébastien Noel's 2021 note to the bug report is germane to this >discussion: > >""" >Same observation here: >DMARC aggregate reports notifies me that emails sends to the BTS >are not delivered to the final recipient. > >I should not be surprised anymore if bugreports are left un-answered, >maintainers are simply not getting notification... > >Since the last comment of this bug, 4 months have passed and no >reaction. >I suspect that nobody recieved the last email, and my guts tell me >that i'm writing to /dev/null rigth now :( > >Without a working BTS, i'm wondering : >Is the project still interested by users' feedback ? >""" > > >[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/09/msg00273.html >[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754809 > Alternatively, BTS users that are interested in others getting their emails might be better off posting from a domain that doesn't have a DMARC policy that's designed to be used for domains that send only transactional email (i.e. no human users). It's working fine for me. Scott K
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Lack of replies Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> - 2023-12-29 23:50 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-12-30 11:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> - 2024-01-02 19:40 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-02 20:30 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2024-01-03 04:10 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-03 18:20 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-03 19:40 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Daniel Gröber <dxld@darkboxed.org> - 2024-01-04 16:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-04 16:20 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-01-04 16:20 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Daniel Gröber <dxld@darkboxed.org> - 2024-01-04 17:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-01-04 17:30 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-04 18:10 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2024-01-04 16:30 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-04 17:00 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Michael Neuffer <neuffer@neuffer.com> - 2024-01-03 06:10 +0100
Re: Lack of replies Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-01-03 18:10 +0100
csiph-web