Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #261008
| From | Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail |
| Date | 2023-08-19 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <H4uOl-2XSZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <H35Im-24T8-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <H37Ka-265V-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 8/15/23 12:13, Bret Busby wrote: > On 16/8/23 00:43, Peter Ehlert wrote: >> >> >> I am a long time user of Thunderbird. No real complaints, but the GUI >> has been slowly been changed. >> lately I have been struggling with that, trying to get it to be My >> Way. Minor success. >> >> also the .msf files have gotten Huge and that hinders rapid and easy >> backups. >> >> In the process I would like to do some housekeeping, fix a few >> filters and rearrange my copious folders. >> >> Question: do you folks recommend migrating to Claws Mail? >> the initial look and feel seems to be familiar and comfortable, but I >> know little of the history and stability. >> >> secondly, will I be missing the basic features such as Filters? >> >> thanks in advance. >> > > I use both email applications, separately for different email accounts. > > I use claws mail for a minor email account, in which I may get one or > two (or, if spammed, more) messages, each month. > > I use Thunderbird for my primary email account, which can get many (a > hundred, or, hundreds, depending on what is happening)messages, each day. > > My use of Thunderbird, is basically as a webmail kind of application, > over which, I have more control, than over something like horde or > roundcube (that has been imposed to replace horde). At the end of each > month (or, more frequently, depending on the number of messages left > after preliminary sifting out of chaff), I download my incoming email, > using the most powerful email application that I have encountered, > alpine, that was evolved from pine. All my download email filtering, > is done using alpine, with hundreds of filters, each with up to a > couple of hundred different field values. I have several hundred or > more, folders, for storing my downloaded messages, with some folders > being archived on a monthly basis, depending on the usual volume of > messages in each folder. My mail folder (the mail messages folder for > alpine), is somewhere around 20GB, and contains messages up to about > 20 years old. > > Claws mail has an official users mailing list, which, I believe, is > hosted and administered by the application developer, who also answers > queries on the list. > > Thunderbird email has no official users mailing list, but has two > unofficial users mailing lists, hosted on groups.io, with a different > priority for each mailing list, and, each of those lists, is run by > volunteers, with no support on those lists, from Thunderbird or its > developers. > Thunderbird developers, and, the Thunderbird organisation, have yet to > adapt to using email (it is a bit like the oxymoron "military > intelligence", as referenced by the character played by Danny de Vito > in the movie of that name - Thunderbird developers and the Thunderbird > organisation, have so little regard for email, that they do not > provide official users mailing lists, for announcements, providing > support, etc - some of the operating systems, on which email > applications run, such as Debian, and Ubuntu, are far more adept at > using email - the Thunderbird organisation, has yet to come to terms > with the use of email). I find the lack of a mailing list rather ironic. > > Oh, and, alpine has an official mailing list, involving the developer > of alpine, who also provides answers to queries (and, considers > development suggestions) made on that list. > > So, the Thunderbird organisation is a bit backward... > > .. > Bret Busby > Armadale > West Australia > (UTC+0800) > .............. > >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-08-15 19:10 +0200
Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Marco <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-08-15 19:20 +0200
Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-08-15 20:40 +0200
Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2023-08-15 21:20 +0200
Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail "Russell L. Harris" <russell@rlharris.org> - 2023-08-15 21:50 +0200
Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2023-08-15 23:30 +0200
Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Frank Lanitz <frank@frank.uvena.de> - 2023-08-29 20:30 +0200
Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-08-19 16:10 +0200
Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2023-08-19 16:30 +0200
Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 04:30 +0200
Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-08-19 16:20 +0200
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-11-18 18:10 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail peter ehlert <sdibaja@gmail.com> - 2023-11-18 18:30 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail peter ehlert <sdibaja@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 16:00 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Alex <alex@blueselene.com> - 2023-11-18 19:10 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 01:10 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 02:30 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-18 20:30 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-11-18 22:30 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-19 13:10 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-11-19 05:40 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-11-19 06:50 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-19 13:00 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-19 17:20 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-11-19 17:00 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2023-11-19 19:00 +0100
Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-11-21 04:50 +0100
csiph-web