Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #263745

Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail

From David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail
Date 2023-11-21 04:50 +0100
Message-ID <HCpVT-6Sh5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <H35Im-24T8-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <HBwZr-6kya-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat 18 Nov 2023 at 08:58:41 (-0800), Peter Ehlert wrote:
> thread back from the dead:
> first, thanks for all of the input and wise suggestions
> 
> I am going crazy with Thunderbird, and Claws too.
> Now Claws has a calendar add-on, did not try it but maybe it will suffice.
> 
> My longtime web and email host support have been struggling to help
> me, Kudos to webmasters dot com
> 
> IMP vs POP ...the "web" seems to reverse the definitions! I don't know
> who to trust
> 
> I really want to keep messages on their server, space is Not an issue.
> 
> Question: with IMAP is it feasible for a mail client to Leave messages
> on the server?

Well, sorting by Date, mutt lists your post at position:

  33858   L  231118       Peter Ehlert       (1.2K) Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail

out of a total of 33910 on the server (in the UK). The posts are also
all on this machine here:

  ~/.cache/mutt/imaps:ABC@DEF.co.uk@GHI.co.uk:993/INBOX$ ls -1 | wc -l
  35700
  ~/.cache/mutt/imaps:ABC@DEF.co.uk@GHI.co.uk:993/INBOX$ du -sh
  630M    .
  ~/.cache/mutt/imaps:ABC@DEF.co.uk@GHI.co.uk:993/INBOX$ 

(Some posts in my cache are orphaned, for straightforward reasons
I won't bother to explain here.)

Cheers,
David.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-08-15 19:10 +0200
  Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Marco <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-08-15 19:20 +0200
  Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-08-15 20:40 +0200
  Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2023-08-15 21:20 +0200
    Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail "Russell L. Harris" <russell@rlharris.org> - 2023-08-15 21:50 +0200
      Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2023-08-15 23:30 +0200
      Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Frank Lanitz <frank@frank.uvena.de> - 2023-08-29 20:30 +0200
    Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-08-19 16:10 +0200
      Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2023-08-19 16:30 +0200
  Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 04:30 +0200
    Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-08-19 16:20 +0200
  Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-11-18 18:10 +0100
    Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail peter ehlert <sdibaja@gmail.com> - 2023-11-18 18:30 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail peter ehlert <sdibaja@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 16:00 +0100
    Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Alex <alex@blueselene.com> - 2023-11-18 19:10 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 01:10 +0100
        Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 02:30 +0100
    Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-18 20:30 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-11-18 22:30 +0100
        Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-19 13:10 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-11-19 05:40 +0100
        Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-11-19 06:50 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-19 13:00 +0100
        Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-19 17:20 +0100
    Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-11-19 17:00 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2023-11-19 19:00 +0100
    Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-11-21 04:50 +0100

csiph-web