Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #258706
| From | Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: netmask question |
| Date | 2023-05-27 03:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GzQL7-bFWP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <Gyo4x-aLWm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <Gyo4x-aLWm-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <GyonT-aM2U-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GzQBr-bFTJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <GzQBr-bFTJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 09:07:23PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 12:59:59AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 08:26:47PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > > > No. What's the netmask if you have: > > > > > > IP: 192.168.255.132 > > > broadcast: 192.168.255.255 ? > > > > It's 255.255.0.0. > > > > Specifying a broadcast address does completely define the network > > range. If you know that 192.168.255.255 is the broadcast then the > > network can only be 192.168.0.0/16. > > Dan's example was carefully chosen so that this is not true. The last > 16 bits of the broadcast address are all 1. This means the network > part of the address could be anywhere from 16 to 31 bits. All are > equally possible. Yes, sorry, of course you (and Dan) are correct. There is no reason why it could not be describing, for example, 192.168.255.0/24 (255.255.255.0 netmask). That will teach me to not write emails at 2am! Cheers, Andy -- https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
netmask question coreyh@free.fr - 2023-05-22 04:50 +0200
Re: netmask question Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-05-22 05:00 +0200
Re: netmask question Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-05-22 09:50 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-22 10:10 +0200
Re: netmask question coreyh@free.fr - 2023-05-22 11:00 +0200
Re: netmask question Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-05-22 11:10 +0200
Re: netmask question coreyh@free.fr - 2023-05-22 12:20 +0200
Re: netmask question Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-05-22 12:30 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-05-22 13:10 +0200
Re: netmask question Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-05-22 12:20 +0200
Re: netmask question Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-05-22 12:30 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-22 13:10 +0200
Re: netmask question Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-05-22 05:10 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-22 07:00 +0200
Re: netmask question Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-05-22 09:40 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-22 10:00 +0200
Re: netmask question Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-05-22 12:20 +0200
Re: netmask question gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-22 18:20 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-22 21:10 +0200
Re: netmask question gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-23 01:50 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2023-05-23 03:20 +0200
Re: netmask question debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2023-05-23 12:50 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2023-05-23 14:20 +0200
Re: netmask question tomas@tuxteam.de - 2023-05-23 07:00 +0200
Re: netmask question "Tom Reed" <tom@dkinbox.com> - 2023-05-23 01:50 +0200
Re: netmask question Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-05-23 02:10 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-23 06:40 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-05-23 02:30 +0200
Re: netmask question "Tom Reed" <tom@dkinbox.com> - 2023-05-23 02:30 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-05-23 02:50 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-23 06:50 +0200
Re: netmask question Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2023-05-27 03:10 +0200
Re: netmask question Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-05-27 03:10 +0200
Re: netmask question Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2023-05-27 03:20 +0200
Re: netmask question Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-05-23 02:50 +0200
Re: netmask question "Tom Reed" <tom@dkinbox.com> - 2023-05-23 03:00 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-05-23 03:20 +0200
Re: netmask question Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-05-23 08:30 +0200
Re: netmask question Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-05-23 02:50 +0200
csiph-web