Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #258590
| From | Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: netmask question |
| Date | 2023-05-22 09:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Gy8sN-aCBa-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Gy3Mt-azy9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Gy3W9-azB9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, 21 May 2023, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > The only address that should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255 is the > Loopback interface. > I don't much use ipv4 any more if I can avoid it but isn't it normal for point-to-point links to have a netmask of 255.255.255.255? It definitely can be, maybe not so common as I assumed. loopback is a /8
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
netmask question coreyh@free.fr - 2023-05-22 04:50 +0200
Re: netmask question Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-05-22 05:00 +0200
Re: netmask question Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-05-22 09:50 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-22 10:10 +0200
Re: netmask question coreyh@free.fr - 2023-05-22 11:00 +0200
Re: netmask question Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-05-22 11:10 +0200
Re: netmask question coreyh@free.fr - 2023-05-22 12:20 +0200
Re: netmask question Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-05-22 12:30 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-05-22 13:10 +0200
Re: netmask question Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-05-22 12:20 +0200
Re: netmask question Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-05-22 12:30 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-22 13:10 +0200
Re: netmask question Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-05-22 05:10 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-22 07:00 +0200
Re: netmask question Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-05-22 09:40 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-22 10:00 +0200
Re: netmask question Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-05-22 12:20 +0200
Re: netmask question gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-22 18:20 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-22 21:10 +0200
Re: netmask question gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-23 01:50 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2023-05-23 03:20 +0200
Re: netmask question debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2023-05-23 12:50 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2023-05-23 14:20 +0200
Re: netmask question tomas@tuxteam.de - 2023-05-23 07:00 +0200
Re: netmask question "Tom Reed" <tom@dkinbox.com> - 2023-05-23 01:50 +0200
Re: netmask question Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-05-23 02:10 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-23 06:40 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-05-23 02:30 +0200
Re: netmask question "Tom Reed" <tom@dkinbox.com> - 2023-05-23 02:30 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-05-23 02:50 +0200
Re: netmask question <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-23 06:50 +0200
Re: netmask question Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2023-05-27 03:10 +0200
Re: netmask question Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-05-27 03:10 +0200
Re: netmask question Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2023-05-27 03:20 +0200
Re: netmask question Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-05-23 02:50 +0200
Re: netmask question "Tom Reed" <tom@dkinbox.com> - 2023-05-23 03:00 +0200
Re: netmask question Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-05-23 03:20 +0200
Re: netmask question Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-05-23 08:30 +0200
Re: netmask question Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-05-23 02:50 +0200
csiph-web