Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #256249
| From | Lionel Élie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian |
| Date | 2023-03-21 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <GbFe9-e1Xu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <GbwXf-dTth-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Gbz8J-dVYx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:33:26PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Is there any good low-hassle freedom-respecting reasonable price >> reasonable performance computer platform for running Debian these > Define your notion of "reasonable" for price and for performance. Performance-wise, for the laptop, I'd like aptitude not to compute (search for a dependencies solution) for much more than a few seconds each time I press the "+" key to upgrade a package, while having stable, stable-security, testing and sid in my sources.list My Core2 Duo clearly is far slower than that. For the desktop, I want to compile LibreOffice, with maximum debugging. Realistically, this is a big job, so won't take mere minutes, but let's say be within the same order of magnitude than a new amd64 machine? Price-wise... I'm willing to invest, but not to come close to five digits in EUR/USD/GBP. -- Lionel
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Lionel Élie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> - 2023-03-21 00:20 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-03-21 00:30 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Lionel Élie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> - 2023-03-21 01:40 +0100
Memory use (was: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-03-21 03:10 +0100
Re: Memory use (was: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian) Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2023-03-21 03:30 +0100
Re: Memory use (was: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian) Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2023-03-21 03:30 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-03-21 02:40 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 03:00 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Ramces Tampo-og Red <lists-16494@citadel.tokyo> - 2023-03-21 07:20 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Lionel Élie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> - 2023-03-21 09:10 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-03-21 14:40 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2023-03-21 10:20 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian "der.hans" <deb-user@LuftHans.com> - 2023-03-22 21:10 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2023-03-22 11:20 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Lionel Élie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> - 2023-03-22 20:10 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2023-03-22 20:40 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2023-03-23 00:10 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-03-23 05:10 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian David <curmudgeon@telaman.net.au> - 2023-03-23 05:40 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Lionel Élie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> - 2023-03-23 11:40 +0100
csiph-web