Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #256246
| From | Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Memory use (was: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian) |
| Date | 2023-03-21 03:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <GbzV7-dXDI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <GbwXf-dTth-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Gbx6V-dTwj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GbycG-dUum-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GbzBL-dX61-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 21/3/23 10:02, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > So, maybe there's a "good" reason why Apple still configures their > cheapest laptop with only 8GB of RAM: for "normal" work it's still > perfectly sufficient, despite all the best efforts of web site designers > out there. > [ But I would recommend against buying a desktop/laptop with 8GB now > unless you can easily expand it later. ] > > > Stefan > On a tangent, I've just set up a Debian 11 Linode LEMP server with 1GB RAM and 10GB Disk. It's not in the least troubled by the limited memory. Also there is no swap in the default image - which seem sensible as it's on a SSD and you don't want to be exercising a SSD with lots of swaps df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on udev 482172 0 482172 0% /dev tmpfs 100004 452 99552 1% /run /dev/sda 25207476 2287196 21619456 10% / tmpfs 500016 0 500016 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 5120 0 5120 0% /run/lock tmpfs 100000 0 100000 0% /run/user/0 -- Jeremy (Lists)
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Lionel Élie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> - 2023-03-21 00:20 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-03-21 00:30 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Lionel Élie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> - 2023-03-21 01:40 +0100
Memory use (was: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-03-21 03:10 +0100
Re: Memory use (was: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian) Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2023-03-21 03:30 +0100
Re: Memory use (was: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian) Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2023-03-21 03:30 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-03-21 02:40 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 03:00 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Ramces Tampo-og Red <lists-16494@citadel.tokyo> - 2023-03-21 07:20 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Lionel Élie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> - 2023-03-21 09:10 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-03-21 14:40 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2023-03-21 10:20 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian "der.hans" <deb-user@LuftHans.com> - 2023-03-22 21:10 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2023-03-22 11:20 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Lionel Élie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> - 2023-03-22 20:10 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2023-03-22 20:40 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2023-03-23 00:10 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-03-23 05:10 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian David <curmudgeon@telaman.net.au> - 2023-03-23 05:40 +0100
Re: good freedom-respecting computer for running Debian Lionel Élie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> - 2023-03-23 11:40 +0100
csiph-web