Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14153
| From | Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package |
| Date | 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EvIQx-3dGO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <Evxs5-3638-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvAJk-38p1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvHKN-3cT1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIGR-3dDp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIQx-3dGO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:51:08AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > It seems to me that generated files shouldn't be shipped as part of the > source we distributed to users. Those files should be (re)generated at > build time. Ah, I understand you better now. Debian is full of generated files distributed in source packages. Most of them could be regenerated at build time, but it's often not done. (If they cannot be regenerated from source, then there's a DFSG issue.) A search of the mailing list archives would probably find many discussions about this; I'm not sure what the current consensus is. Best wishes, Julian
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 02:10 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 03:20 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 04:30 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 04:50 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 16:50 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:50 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 15:30 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:10 +0200
Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 16:30 +0200
Re: Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 03:30 +0200
csiph-web