Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14153

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package

Path csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package
Date Tue, 07 Jun 2022 17:00:01 +0200
Message-ID <EvIQx-3dGO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EvuXf-34C0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvuXf-34C0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evw2Z-35cy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evx8J-35Wo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evxs5-3638-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvAJk-38p1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvHKN-3cT1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIGR-3dDp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIQx-3dGO-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jun 7 14:55:54 2022
Old-Return-Path <julian@d-and-j.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.11 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -4.6
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19982
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Yp9m7diwA2deFWkQ@d-and-j.net
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 15
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com>, debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:55:41 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <Yp9m7diwA2deFWkQ@d-and-j.net>
X-Original-References <87sfohoni3.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <fe867c28-62cc-f02b-0f71-6e4990ed8ac4@gmail.com> <0f84e96b-c0eb-2d0e-fc7e-a8b272549aea@gmail.com> <87fskhb44h.fsf@angela.anarc.at> <367c1fcc-e57e-bde4-61eb-787042586a60@gmail.com> <Yp7sA2fh2MruNE9C@d-and-j.net> <87pmjkzitm.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <Yp9kTN3n7P3sCqRA@d-and-j.net> <87v8tcy1b7.fsf@curie.anarc.at>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14153

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:51:08AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> It seems to me that generated files shouldn't be shipped as part of the
> source we distributed to users. Those files should be (re)generated at
> build time.

Ah, I understand you better now.  Debian is full of generated files
distributed in source packages.  Most of them could be regenerated at
build time, but it's often not done.  (If they cannot be regenerated
from source, then there's a DFSG issue.)  A search of the mailing list
archives would probably find many discussions about this; I'm not sure
what the current consensus is.

Best wishes,

   Julian

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 02:10 +0200
  Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 03:20 +0200
    Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 04:30 +0200
      Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 04:50 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 16:50 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:50 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 15:30 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:10 +0200
        Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 16:30 +0200
          Re: Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 03:30 +0200

csiph-web