Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14166

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package

From Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package
Date 2022-06-08 15:30 +0200
Message-ID <Ew3UZ-3rFU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <EvHKN-3cT1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIGR-3dDp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIQx-3dGO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIQx-3dGO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvQbn-3ihk-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Debian

Show all headers | View raw


On 2022-06-07 18:46:37, Ben Westover wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've read more into versioneer, and it turns out with the way it works 
> you can't simply remove versioneer.py from the source, much less 
> _version.py. Therefore, I'm excluding _version.py in d/copyright, then 
> replacing it with the much smaller PyPI version in d/patches, and not 
> touching versioneer.py at all, since with the way versioneer works it's 
> technically not vendoring.

Got it, thanks for bearing with me here.
-- 
The destiny of Earthseed is to take root among the stars.
                        - Octavia Butler

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 02:10 +0200
  Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 03:20 +0200
    Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 04:30 +0200
      Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 04:50 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 16:50 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:50 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 15:30 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:10 +0200
        Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 16:30 +0200
          Re: Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 03:30 +0200

csiph-web