Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14149

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package

From Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package
Date 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
Message-ID <EvHKN-3cT1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EvuXf-34C0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvuXf-34C0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evw2Z-35cy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evx8J-35Wo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evxs5-3638-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Debian

Show all headers | View raw


On 2022-06-06 22:42:53, Ben Westover wrote:
> Hello Antoine,
>
>>>> I am aware of this failure and have reported it upstream. For now, I'll
>>>> disable the offending test.
>>>
>>> After doing that, I discovered that almost all of the tests are faulty
>>> (at least on Python 3.10), so I've disabled tests altogether for now.
>> 
>> Does the package *work* at all in 3.10? We might not want to silence
>> real errors here...
>
> Upstream says 3.4-3.9 is supported, but I don't know if that's because 
> 3.10 doesn't work or because they haven't bothered to add it. Searching 
> their bug tracker, I wasn't able to find any 3.10-related issues yet.
> I also haven't tried to use the program with Python 3.10, because I 
> don't use it myself at all (packaging this for a friend).

I think it's worth doing a trial run in an actual unstable VM before
disabling those tests. Otherwise we're just guessing and we might put a
completely non-working package out there... That's going to help no one:
neither our users or upstream...

>>> _version.py is not a copy of versioneer, it's *generated* by versioneer.
>>> However, there is versioneer.py in the root directory, which is. I'll
>>> exclude that from the source and repack.
>> 
>> hmm... how about that generated file though? shouldn't it be ... well,
>> generated at build time instead? :)
>
> As far as I understand it, this file is used by the author of the 
> program, not end users. I don't understand it well, though, because I 
> haven't put much time into researching what versioneer even does.
> If my hunch is correct, I may be able to just remove the file from the 
> source altogether, but I haven't tried that yet.

Well, it's used by the program to show the version info, so it's
*eventually* used by users for sure.

I think just removing the file is a good first guess.

>> let me know when / if you need me to look at it again, and thanks again!
>
> It should be ready for review now, as long as I haven't messed anything 
> up majorly in my attempts to fix the issues you brought to my attention.

Did you remove the versioneer file though?

-- 
Striving for social justice is the most valuable thing to do in life
                       - Albert Einstein

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 02:10 +0200
  Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 03:20 +0200
    Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 04:30 +0200
      Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 04:50 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 16:50 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:50 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 15:30 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:10 +0200
        Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 16:30 +0200
          Re: Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 03:30 +0200

csiph-web