Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14149
| Path | csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!news.misty.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package |
| Date | Tue, 07 Jun 2022 15:50:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EvHKN-3cT1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EvuXf-34C0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvuXf-34C0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evw2Z-35cy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evx8J-35Wo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evxs5-3638-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jun 7 13:47:31 2022 |
| Old-Return-Path | <anarcat@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-108.021 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.801, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -3.5 |
| Organization | Debian |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19976 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87sfogziu5.fsf@curie.anarc.at |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 51 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 07 Jun 2022 09:47:14 -0400 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <87sfogziu5.fsf@curie.anarc.at> |
| X-Original-References | <87sfohoni3.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <fe867c28-62cc-f02b-0f71-6e4990ed8ac4@gmail.com> <0f84e96b-c0eb-2d0e-fc7e-a8b272549aea@gmail.com> <87fskhb44h.fsf@angela.anarc.at> <367c1fcc-e57e-bde4-61eb-787042586a60@gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14149 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2022-06-06 22:42:53, Ben Westover wrote:
> Hello Antoine,
>
>>>> I am aware of this failure and have reported it upstream. For now, I'll
>>>> disable the offending test.
>>>
>>> After doing that, I discovered that almost all of the tests are faulty
>>> (at least on Python 3.10), so I've disabled tests altogether for now.
>>
>> Does the package *work* at all in 3.10? We might not want to silence
>> real errors here...
>
> Upstream says 3.4-3.9 is supported, but I don't know if that's because
> 3.10 doesn't work or because they haven't bothered to add it. Searching
> their bug tracker, I wasn't able to find any 3.10-related issues yet.
> I also haven't tried to use the program with Python 3.10, because I
> don't use it myself at all (packaging this for a friend).
I think it's worth doing a trial run in an actual unstable VM before
disabling those tests. Otherwise we're just guessing and we might put a
completely non-working package out there... That's going to help no one:
neither our users or upstream...
>>> _version.py is not a copy of versioneer, it's *generated* by versioneer.
>>> However, there is versioneer.py in the root directory, which is. I'll
>>> exclude that from the source and repack.
>>
>> hmm... how about that generated file though? shouldn't it be ... well,
>> generated at build time instead? :)
>
> As far as I understand it, this file is used by the author of the
> program, not end users. I don't understand it well, though, because I
> haven't put much time into researching what versioneer even does.
> If my hunch is correct, I may be able to just remove the file from the
> source altogether, but I haven't tried that yet.
Well, it's used by the program to show the version info, so it's
*eventually* used by users for sure.
I think just removing the file is a good first guess.
>> let me know when / if you need me to look at it again, and thanks again!
>
> It should be ready for review now, as long as I haven't messed anything
> up majorly in my attempts to fix the issues you brought to my attention.
Did you remove the versioneer file though?
--
Striving for social justice is the most valuable thing to do in life
- Albert Einstein
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 02:10 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 03:20 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 04:30 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 04:50 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 16:50 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:50 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 15:30 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:10 +0200
Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 16:30 +0200
Re: Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 03:30 +0200
csiph-web