Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1096996

Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version

From Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version
Date 2022-03-17 01:00 +0100
Message-ID <E1LIB-2dVF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <E1kS5-1XZm-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <E1inf-1WrN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <E1DUJ-29lu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <E1inf-1WrN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <E1DUJ-29lu-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Wookware

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 2022-03-16 15:29 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> In practice, the vast majority of packages are maintained in git on
> salsa.  The maintainers use those git repositories as the PFM.

> but almost everyone is already treating git as primary.

Is this definitely true? For example: I know I'm not doing this. I did
try, and I do have some git repos on salsa, but I've mostly given up
with it all and stuck with uscan and tarballs and quilt (and my trusty
'packages' directory). It's much easier for me. (The salsa repos that
exist for my packages are not canonical and often stale).

I'm sure Ian is right that there is a trend towards git from tarballs
and dscs, but I just question whether we know it is 'the vast
majority'? Are there really now very few maintainers using the
'classic tooling'? How do we know?

Wookey
-- 
Principal hats:  Debian, Wookware, ARM
http://wookware.org/

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2022-03-15 17:40 +0100
  Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2022-03-15 18:00 +0100
    Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2022-03-15 20:00 +0100
      Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2022-03-15 20:30 +0100
  Bug#1007717: Fwd: Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0 Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2022-03-15 18:00 +0100
  Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-15 20:00 +0100
    Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-16 04:50 +0100
      Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-16 05:40 +0100
        Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2022-03-16 16:10 +0100
          Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-16 17:00 +0100
        Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2022-03-17 08:00 +0100
          Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 15:40 +0100
          Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 19:00 +0100
            Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 19:30 +0100
              Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 20:00 +0100
                Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2022-03-17 20:50 +0100
            Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> - 2022-03-20 17:40 +0100
  Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2022-03-15 20:20 +0100
    Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-15 22:20 +0100
    Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2022-03-16 16:40 +0100
      Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2022-03-17 01:00 +0100
        Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 08:40 +0100
  Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 22:40 +0100
  Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-29 21:40 +0200
  Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2022-03-29 22:40 +0200

csiph-web