Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1096801
| From | Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version |
| Date | 2022-03-15 17:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <E1inf-1WrN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <E1inf-1WrN-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Package: tech-ctte
(Sorry for the resend, this should have gone to the BTS the first
time; have fixed a slip in the wording.)
Please:
Part I - belss continued use of 1.0 native format, for now at least:
1. Declare explicitly that there is nothing wrong with a package with
a native format, but a non-native version number.
2. Request that the dpkg maintainer relax the restriction which
prevents the use of 3.0 native with Debian revision.
3. Consequently, declare that the recent MBF on this topic ought not
to have been filed against packages where simply changing the
source format does not currently work. That would include at
least 1.0 native packages with Debian revisions.
Part II - bless continued use of 1.0-with-diff, for now at least:
4. Declare that sometimes the use of 1.0-with-diff can be the best
tradeoff between different considerations. In particular,
because 1.0 is the only format which botH:
(a) Optimises bandwidth and storage by reusing the upstream
data when it hasn't changed.
(b) Avoids polluting the working tree (package source code)
with [patches], which cause trouble especially with
git-based workflows.
5. Consequently, declare that the recent MBF on this topic ought not
to have been filed against 1.0 with diff packages, at least
without some further filter.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2022-03-15 17:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2022-03-15 18:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2022-03-15 20:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2022-03-15 20:30 +0100
Bug#1007717: Fwd: Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0 Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2022-03-15 18:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-15 20:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-16 04:50 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-16 05:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2022-03-16 16:10 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-16 17:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2022-03-17 08:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 15:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 19:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 19:30 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 20:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2022-03-17 20:50 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> - 2022-03-20 17:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2022-03-15 20:20 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-15 22:20 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2022-03-16 16:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2022-03-17 01:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 08:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 22:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-29 21:40 +0200
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2022-03-29 22:40 +0200
csiph-web