Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1096996
| From | Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version |
| Date | 2022-03-17 01:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <E1LIB-2dVF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <E1kS5-1XZm-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <E1inf-1WrN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <E1DUJ-29lu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <E1inf-1WrN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <E1DUJ-29lu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Wookware |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2022-03-16 15:29 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > In practice, the vast majority of packages are maintained in git on > salsa. The maintainers use those git repositories as the PFM. > but almost everyone is already treating git as primary. Is this definitely true? For example: I know I'm not doing this. I did try, and I do have some git repos on salsa, but I've mostly given up with it all and stuck with uscan and tarballs and quilt (and my trusty 'packages' directory). It's much easier for me. (The salsa repos that exist for my packages are not canonical and often stale). I'm sure Ian is right that there is a trend towards git from tarballs and dscs, but I just question whether we know it is 'the vast majority'? Are there really now very few maintainers using the 'classic tooling'? How do we know? Wookey -- Principal hats: Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2022-03-15 17:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2022-03-15 18:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2022-03-15 20:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2022-03-15 20:30 +0100
Bug#1007717: Fwd: Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0 Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2022-03-15 18:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-15 20:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-16 04:50 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-16 05:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2022-03-16 16:10 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-16 17:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2022-03-17 08:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 15:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 19:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 19:30 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 20:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2022-03-17 20:50 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> - 2022-03-20 17:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2022-03-15 20:20 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-15 22:20 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2022-03-16 16:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2022-03-17 01:00 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 08:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-17 22:40 +0100
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2022-03-29 21:40 +0200
Bug#1007717: Native source package format with non-native version Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2022-03-29 22:40 +0200
csiph-web