Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #5994

Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims

From Robert Ricardo Ikaka <ikaka.robert.online@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims
Date 2022-01-15 04:30 +0100
Message-ID <DFHVo-7C2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <DzZBF-2LF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <DC7Y5-7cX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DDVzs-1D2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFhRf-6CP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFDyq-4Hf-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

https://chng.it/jJvMChbdsJ

сб, 15 янв. 2022 г., 01:45 Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org>:

>
> max  <maxwillb@mailfence.com> wrote on 14/01/2022 at 00:38:44+0100:
>
> > January 10, 2022 6:31:37 AM CET Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> We are going to stop anyway at some point displaying the NVD severity,
> for context see #992115.
> >
> > As I see it, Debian should be free to display or not display NVD
> > ratings, but it shouldn't display the incorrect "medium" NVD ratings,
> > when they are actually much worse, as it's been doing. In fact, I
> > think it should issue a public retraction.
> >
> > Any progress on my original proposal? Are the wheels in motion?
> >
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2021/12/msg00002.html
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2022/01/msg00002.html
> >
> > I can't help but feel that it's a 15 second job for anyone with write
> > access to the site, and the reprehensibility of the current claims
> > should be obvious to those with a working moral compass.
>
> Maybe at some time you could just stop keeping on insisting on that
> matter?
>
> Regards,
> --
> PEB
>
>

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max  <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2021-12-30 10:10 +0100
  Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Silas Cutler <Silas@BlackLab.io> - 2021-12-30 17:20 +0100
    Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-01-05 07:30 +0100
  Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-01-05 07:30 +0100
    Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max  <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-10 01:50 +0100
    Incorrect NVD severity ratings: (was: replacing misleading  debian.org/security claims) max  <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-10 02:00 +0100
    Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-01-10 06:40 +0100
      Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max  <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-14 00:40 +0100
        Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-14 23:50 +0100
          Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Robert Ricardo Ikaka <ikaka.robert.online@gmail.com> - 2022-01-15 04:30 +0100
          Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max  <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-18 05:50 +0100
            Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-18 23:40 +0100
              Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max  <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-20 23:00 +0100
                Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims RP <reyadmin@gmail.com> - 2022-01-21 02:20 +0100
                Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-21 12:00 +0100

csiph-web