Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5994
| From | Robert Ricardo Ikaka <ikaka.robert.online@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims |
| Date | 2022-01-15 04:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DFHVo-7C2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <DzZBF-2LF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <DC7Y5-7cX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DDVzs-1D2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFhRf-6CP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFDyq-4Hf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
https://chng.it/jJvMChbdsJ сб, 15 янв. 2022 г., 01:45 Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org>: > > max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> wrote on 14/01/2022 at 00:38:44+0100: > > > January 10, 2022 6:31:37 AM CET Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> > wrote: > > > >> We are going to stop anyway at some point displaying the NVD severity, > for context see #992115. > > > > As I see it, Debian should be free to display or not display NVD > > ratings, but it shouldn't display the incorrect "medium" NVD ratings, > > when they are actually much worse, as it's been doing. In fact, I > > think it should issue a public retraction. > > > > Any progress on my original proposal? Are the wheels in motion? > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2021/12/msg00002.html > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2022/01/msg00002.html > > > > I can't help but feel that it's a 15 second job for anyone with write > > access to the site, and the reprehensibility of the current claims > > should be obvious to those with a working moral compass. > > Maybe at some time you could just stop keeping on insisting on that > matter? > > Regards, > -- > PEB > >
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2021-12-30 10:10 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Silas Cutler <Silas@BlackLab.io> - 2021-12-30 17:20 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-01-05 07:30 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-01-05 07:30 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-10 01:50 +0100
Incorrect NVD severity ratings: (was: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims) max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-10 02:00 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-01-10 06:40 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-14 00:40 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-14 23:50 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Robert Ricardo Ikaka <ikaka.robert.online@gmail.com> - 2022-01-15 04:30 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-18 05:50 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-18 23:40 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-20 23:00 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims RP <reyadmin@gmail.com> - 2022-01-21 02:20 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-21 12:00 +0100
csiph-web