Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5994
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Robert Ricardo Ikaka <ikaka.robert.online@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims |
| Date | Sat, 15 Jan 2022 04:30:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DFHVo-7C2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <DzZBF-2LF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <DC7Y5-7cX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DDVzs-1D2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFhRf-6CP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFDyq-4Hf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-security-request@lists.debian.org Sat Jan 15 03:20:18 2022 |
| Old-Return-Path | <ikaka.robert.online@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-5.199 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5.5 |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AOAM5310oeLOGvLCt168i2ypQSzoHC+kWBJlupHA9xKCB2tL+jzv/EMj 44REPMFNxyaKNwdRqLjxt512lOLJW3tYYJ5u3EQ= |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | ABdhPJzNJCIP2nW5fmNK2FakOHJ76XGKFiY4A6V631hc5iVHgMcezEuf5KAaMzS0O0NIyqRXZBNOOa1t2eHhzzbwRLM= |
| X-Received | by 2002:a63:d753:: with SMTP id w19mr2317347pgi.23.1642216800927; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:20:00 -0800 (PST) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000010448805d59665a9" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-security@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/29138 |
| List-ID | <debian-security.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAPg0vjro5FDF0ZOTFz2_s29vryxS=E81SgHWLmW+cVAfK9R5uA@mail.gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 94 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | max <maxwillb@mailfence.com>, Security <security@debian.org>, debian-security@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Sat, 15 Jan 2022 06:19:49 +0300 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CAPg0vjro5FDF0ZOTFz2_s29vryxS=E81SgHWLmW+cVAfK9R5uA@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <930530503.813075.1640717192123@ichabod.co-bxl> <6b04bca57af4c49dca74e9089f7d9ad49f4058b5.camel@debian.org> <YdvEubL6/Y6+QeWL@eldamar.lan> <896508942.487248.1642117124251@ichabod.co-bxl> <874k66hr7u.fsf@jaatynyt> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.security:5994 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
https://chng.it/jJvMChbdsJ сб, 15 янв. 2022 г., 01:45 Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org>: > > max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> wrote on 14/01/2022 at 00:38:44+0100: > > > January 10, 2022 6:31:37 AM CET Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> > wrote: > > > >> We are going to stop anyway at some point displaying the NVD severity, > for context see #992115. > > > > As I see it, Debian should be free to display or not display NVD > > ratings, but it shouldn't display the incorrect "medium" NVD ratings, > > when they are actually much worse, as it's been doing. In fact, I > > think it should issue a public retraction. > > > > Any progress on my original proposal? Are the wheels in motion? > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2021/12/msg00002.html > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2022/01/msg00002.html > > > > I can't help but feel that it's a 15 second job for anyone with write > > access to the site, and the reprehensibility of the current claims > > should be obvious to those with a working moral compass. > > Maybe at some time you could just stop keeping on insisting on that > matter? > > Regards, > -- > PEB > >
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2021-12-30 10:10 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Silas Cutler <Silas@BlackLab.io> - 2021-12-30 17:20 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-01-05 07:30 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-01-05 07:30 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-10 01:50 +0100
Incorrect NVD severity ratings: (was: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims) max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-10 02:00 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-01-10 06:40 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-14 00:40 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-14 23:50 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Robert Ricardo Ikaka <ikaka.robert.online@gmail.com> - 2022-01-15 04:30 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-18 05:50 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-18 23:40 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-20 23:00 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims RP <reyadmin@gmail.com> - 2022-01-21 02:20 +0100
Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-21 12:00 +0100
csiph-web