Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #108921
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Why is Jesus the only way? |
| Date | 2017-05-01 11:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D52CCEC2.A2E39%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | <55def7f2-1dcd-49fc-8062-862467f88426@googlegroups.com> <D52BFFC3.A2D57%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <152e3e58-ac01-4b51-9663-26d8853ef50b@googlegroups.com> <D52C9FCD.A2DC6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <f8b67e13-d21a-49dc-a311-d1328bfde6ec@googlegroups.com> |
On 5/1/17, 9:53 AM, in article
f8b67e13-d21a-49dc-a311-d1328bfde6ec@googlegroups.com, "Rick C. Hodgin"
<rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 11:18:32 AM UTC-4, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/1/17, 4:53 AM, in article
>> 152e3e58-ac01-4b51-9663-26d8853ef50b@googlegroups.com, "Rick C. Hodgin"
>> <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>> Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>>> Because of how He was born (of a virgin, He didn't carry original sin).
>>>>
>>>> Does that mean he had to make up his own? And what is sinful about the way
>>>> the rest of us were born? Be fruitful and multiply! That is hardly a sin!
>>>
>>> We are made in the image and likeness of God. He is one God, yet He is
>>> God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit, just as we are one:
>>> soul, body, spirit.
>>>
>>> When Adam sinned, He died spiritually. He passed that on to all of his
>>> descendants. Jesus didn't come from the line of Adam.
>>
>> Mary was not from his line? How is that even possible? And Adam was created
>> by God, so Adam was of the line of God... so same line there, too.
>
> Mary was of the line of Adam.
Ah, so she also carried the sin of Adam and Eve... if you believe that you
are responsible for the actions of your ancestors (and believe the Adam and
Eve story). So Jesus had much the same ties to "original" sin as others.
Interesting.
> You can read her genealogy in Luke.
Or in Matthew... but they are different. Here, the text from each:
Luke 3:23-31:
-----
And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as
was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli, Which
was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son
of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph,
Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which
was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of
Nagge, Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias,
which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was
the son of Juda, Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of
Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of
Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, Which was the son of Melchi,
which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the
son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, Which was the son of Jose,
which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was
the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, Which was the son of
Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph,
which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, Which was
the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of
Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David.
-----
Matthew 1:6-16:
-----
David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;
And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa;
And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat
Ozias; And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz
begat Ezekias; And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon;
and Amon begat Josias; And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren,
about the time they were carried away to Babylon: And after they
were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel
begat Zorobabel; And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim;
and Eliakim begat Azor; And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim;
and Achim begat Eliud; And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat
Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; And Jacob begat Joseph the husband
of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
-----
Not only different names (each has names the other does not) but also
different ORDER of the names they list (for example Eliakim).
> Jesus was conceived of the Holy Spirit and was/is God.
He had a mother, too... who was, if you believe the Adam and Eve story,
their descendant. Or maybe she was related to Adam and Steve and somehow the
two of them had a kid and she was never related to Eve?
>>> He was born of a virgin so He didn't have Adam's original sin.
>>
>> I am not responsible for the actions of my ancestors...
>
> It's not actions, it's the very nature you exist in.
In your view sin is not even an action but just a nature. Does my sin
increase if I refuse to kill people as the Bible describes? How does that
work?
> When Adam sinned, death entered into the world because of sin.
There as never a time when there as multi-celled life without death.
> The Earth changed, the nature of people changed, everything changed. It was a
> changed world from that point forward. But God has rescued us from that
> death-world we live in by sending His Son to pay the price of sin in our
> place, restoring us to that which God originally intended before sin entered
> in and wrecked everything.
>
> Jesus Christ gives men new life. They are born again spiritually, so they are
> restored to the existence Adam and Even would've had on this Earth BEFORE sin.
If death came from that sin then people should no longer die. Your story is
internally inconsistent.
> After sin, they existed very much like the people of this world do ... able to
> be deceived by Satan, being guided into sin and immorality, doing those things
> which only cause harm and death and lay down seeds of destruction over
> millenia.
>
>> the very idea that I am is rather absurd to me. I mean, really, if your
>> great, great grandfather did something horrid do you hold responsibility for
>> it? I say no. Does not mean if he, say, stole a million dollars from another
>> family and you benefit from that you cannot try to make amends by giving them
>> back their money (with interest, etc.) but you are not responsible for the
>> wrongs of others.
>
> It's about our nature, not individual laws which are broken.
Back to sin being a feature of a person and not about their actions. Seems
silly to me.
> But even the lawful indescretions of our ancestors carry forward into us. Our
> families and societies may be built upon evil deeds and deceptive paths to
> wealth, and that spirit the ancestor operated in carries forward to the
> children so they are of that same spirit.
I have friends whose grandparents were Nazis. My friends are not responsible
for their horrid actions.
> There is the spirit nature you are unaware of, Snit.
Something like this? <https://youtu.be/tmnBN9JHd60>
> It's why you find it impossible to understand the things of Jesus and the
> Bible as being true.
It is also because even with the stuff you reference it contradicts itself.
And we have not talked about the evil "lessons" it gives.
> You are only looking at things through your natural understanding, and because
> of sin that understanding is corrupt and can be deceived.
Ah, I only look at it with "natural understanding" -- of which I assume you
mean reason and logic. Yeah, through that lens it makes no sense.
> It's why the path to salvation is to pursue the truth.
Wait: do you want me to pursue truth or look to one ancient and heavily
edited book? Or are you going to pretend they are the same?
> You cannot find the truth on your own.
Well, I certainly learn from others!
> The enemy of this world will deceive you so that you think you have a handle
> on it, but you are still only embracing the lie.
By all means do explain what lie you think I "embrace" -- but be aware I
will ask you to back your claims.
> But when you seek the truth, and honestly desire to know it, God knows you are
> doing this, that you are in pursuit of this. He then reaches into your life
> supernaturally and moves things around and makes it possible for you to come
> to the truth for real. He does the things you cannot do in your sinful,
> fallen state, so that you can come to His Son, repent, ask forgiveness, and be
> saved.
So accept your beliefs or be doomed. That is evil.
> How can the dead man raise Himself? He cannot. But the one who has power
> over life and death can command the dead man to rise, and he will rise.
>
> This is what Jesus does for us by taking our sin away.
Ah, Jesus is a thief. Interesting.
> He has the power over death, Hell, and the grave, and He commands His love
> toward us so that we, even in our sinful death, unable to do anything about
> our state, are overcome by His commanding His love toward us, so that we are
> risen by His Grace.
>
>>> This made Hum a man under our law, but he wasn't already condemned by
>>> original
>>> sin. Any sin He had would either be His own, or any sin He chose to take on
>>> voluntarily of His own volition.
>>>
>>> Jesus was manifested into the world for that purpose: to take away our
>>> sin, and set us free from the judgment and punishment of sin.
>>>
>>> He had no sin of His own, so He was able to go to the cross innocent,
>>> where God the Father supernaturally reached across time to all who
>>> would be saved past, present, and future, transferring their sin unto
>>> Jesus, so that when He died, their sin died with Him, condemning Him
>>> in their place, and setting us free.
>>>
>>> http://biblehub.com/kjv/romans/5-12.htm
>>> http://biblehub.com/kjv/romans/5-14.htm
>>> http://biblehub.com/kjv/romans/5-15.htm
>>>
>>> http://biblehub.com/kjv/1_john/3-8.htm
>>>
>>> You should study the last few things Jesus said from the cross. They
>>> are eye-opening.
>>
>> What about all the evil lessons in the Bible... the support for rape and
>> murder and slavery and all that stuff? The condemning of wearing of clothes
>> made of different fabrics and the like? Do you just find "work arounds" to
>> ignore those things and pretend they are not there but other things matter
>> deeply?
>
> Everything in the Bible is understood in a proper context.
Ah, here come the work-arounds. Just have faith that the details of how to
treat your slaves is al OK. Nope. I will NEVER do that. I will never accept
slavery as being acceptable.
The book you speak of teaches evil lessons.
> Some of it literally cannot be reconciled to the natural understanding only.
> It seems an impossible contradiction that "a loving God" could instruct Israel
> to do some of the things He did.
>
> Satan uses that flesh-based understanding to trap people into man's reasoning
> whereby it's easy to conclude God is something other than He is. Satan uses
> our fallen state against us because we are weak in our flesh, defeated, in
> sin, able to be deceived.
>
> But when we pursue the truth of the matter, and want to know how it is that
> God, who is Love, could do such a thing, command such a thing, teach such a
> thing, etc., and we press in wanting to honestly know the truth of that issue
> ... then He will draw us to the place we need to go to receive that which we
> need to be able to understand it.
>
> Everything comes back to the three-fold nature of man: soul, body, spirit.
> We are spiritually dead, and some things of God can only be understood
> spiritually. It is from within that new nature Jesus makes possible for us to
> have by taking our sin away that we can then understand those aspects of God.
>
> Yet other aspects of God our flesh can understand. We have a legal system.
> If you break the law you pay the price in the legal system. With God and God's
> laws there is a standard of perfection. So, every violation of the law
> demands one punishment for an eternal being bent on disobeying God (who is
> truth, which another way to say that is to say that every violation of the law
> demands one punishment for an eternal being bent on not following what is
> right and true and proper, but instead is embracing their own ideas about what
> is right, even though they do not have the ability to understand the full
> depths of the creation of the universe): Hell. A place of eternal isolation
> with a torment that occupies a soul for all time, so they and their
> false-seeking ideas will never influence creation again.
>
> It's similar to what we would do with a system we created. If we made a piece
> of hardware or designed some software to behave a certain way, we would
> instruct each part (by its design) on how to be, what to do, and what not to
> do. So long as everything obeyed its instruction, we would keep the circuit
> or software in tact. But if we discovered piece X or piece Y or algorithm Z
> was doing something other than we instructed, we would have no qualms with
> taking that errant component out, and possibly replacing it with another.
>
> This is what God has done with His creation, but on the scale of living
> peoples, rather than simple hardware or software.
>
> And to ascribe traits to God that are inappropriate as the guardian of His
> creation is to rise up against Him concluding that you, oh created one, know
> better than He does how His universe should operate.
>
> Our best teams of PhD scientists are discovering things with the LHC today
> that confound the standard model. Our biggest brains do not yet know what is
> going on in this universe, and yet we think we have a handle on things in a
> way to instruct God on how things should be? No, sir. We are the students,
> He is the master.
>
> Everything God has done is in perfect understanding, perfect Love, perfect
> guidance, and perfect focus for a maximum return on that which He has created
> and given free will to: mankind.
>
> Every person who seeks the truth will find it and be saved. The rest will
> perish in their sin because they remain in rebellion against truth, against
> Him, against everything that is right and holy, and they will not be a part of
> His eternal kingdom for those reasons.
>
> It's all there, Snit ... if you want to seek to understand it. But if you want
> to gloss over it, and replace real research and truth-seeking endeavors with
> summary conclusions based on your own personal perceptions about the way
> things are ... then there is an enemy of God who will cater to your personal
> willingness- to-believe systems. You can go to your grave believing whatever
> you want to about all of the things which matter to you.
>
> But if you will simply set your sights on knowing the truth, and asking within
> your own inner-most man questions like: "If I am wrong, then I want to know.
> If there is another way, then I want to know. If Jesus is real, then I want
> to know," and if you really do mean it and aren't just parroting those words
> in some kind of mocking response to this message, then God will know your
> heart and He will make it possible for you to come to the truth.
>
> He honors our free will. He knows who are His, and who will be His. And He
> is already working in the lives of everyone who will come to believe, such
> that when their day comes they will be where they need to be, hearing what
> they need to hear, so that they too can be saved.
>
> God really is in control. Satan has been defeated. The many lies which exist
> in this world are overcome by seeking the truth in all cases (that relate to
> our pursuit of salvation). And Jesus Christ has made it possible, and God
> Himself guides us to each place we need to be to come to saving faith.
>
> Good luck on your endeavor, Snit. Jesus Himself will lead you to truth ... if
> you are interested in finding it. If not, then He also gives the warning that
> such false-seeking endeavors do come with a price: condemnation and Hellfire.
>
> It's your choice. Seek the truth and be saved ... or perish in Hell.
Just so you know, your comments make as much sense as this:
-----
Some of it literally cannot be reconciled to the natural
understanding only. It seems an impossible contradiction that "a
loving Invisible Green Dragon" could instruct The Monkey Palace to
do some of the things She did.
Easy Cheese uses that flesh-based understanding to trap people into
man's reasoning whereby it's easy to conclude Invisible Green Dragon
is something other than She is. Easy Cheese uses our fallen state
against us because we are weak in our flesh, defeated, in sin, able
to be deceived.
But when we pursue the truth of the matter, and want to know how it
is that Invisible Green Dragon, who is Love, could do such a thing,
command such a thing, teach such a thing, etc., and we press in
wanting to honestly know the truth of that issue ... then She will
draw us to the place we need to go to receive that which we need to
be able to understand it.
Everything comes back to the three-fold nature of man: crystal
spiritual energy, body, ethereal penguin essence. We are ethereal
penguin essenceually dead, and some things of Invisible Green Dragon
can only be understood ethereal penguin essenceually. It is from
within that new nature Abraham Lincoln makes possible for us to have
by taking our sin away that we can then understand those aspects of
Invisible Green Dragon.
Yet other aspects of Invisible Green Dragon our flesh can
understand. We have a legal system. If you break the law you pay
the price in the legal system. With Invisible Green Dragon and
Invisible Green Dragon's laws there is a standard of perfection. So,
every violation of the law demands one punishment for an eternal
being bent on disobeying Invisible Green Dragon (who is truth, which
another way to say that is to say that every violation of the law
demands one punishment for an eternal being bent on not following
what is right and true and proper, but instead is embracing their
own ideas about what is right, even though they do not have the
ability to understand the full depths of the creation of the
universe): The inside of a mule's anus. A place of eternal
isolation with a torment that occupies a crystal spiritual energy
for all time, so they and their false-seeking ideas will never
influence creation again.
It's similar to what we would do with a system we created. If we
made a piece of hardware or designed some software to behave a
certain way, we would instruct each part (by its design) on how to
be, what to do, and what not to do. So long as everything obeyed
its instruction, we would keep the circuit or software in tact. But
if we discovered piece X or piece Y or algorithm Z was doing
something other than we instructed, we would have no qualms with
taking that errant component out, and possibly replacing it with
another.
This is what Invisible Green Dragon has done with Her creation, but
on the scale of living peoples, rather than simple hardware or
software.
And to ascribe traits to Invisible Green Dragon that are
inappropriate as the guardian of Her creation is to rise up against
Him concluding that you, oh created one, know better than She does
how Her universe should operate.
Our best teams of PhD scientists are discovering things with the LHC
today that confound the standard model. Our biggest brains do not
yet know what is going on in this universe, and yet we think we have
a handle on things in a way to instruct Invisible Green Dragon on
how things should be? No, sir. We are the students, She is the
master.
Everything Invisible Green Dragon has done is in perfect
understanding, perfect Love, perfect guidance, and perfect focus for
a maximum return on that which She has created and given free will
to: mankind.
Every person who seeks the truth will find it and be saved. The
rest will perish in their sin because they remain in rebellion
against truth, against Him, against everything that is right and
holy, and they will not be a part of Her eternal kingdom for those
reasons.
It's all there, Rick ... if you want to seek to understand it. But
if you want to gloss over it, and replace real research and
truth-seeking endeavors with summary conclusions based on your own
personal perceptions about the way things are ... then there is an
enemy of Invisible Green Dragon who will cater to your personal
willingness- to-believe systems. You can go to your grave believing
whatever you want to about all of the things which matter to you.
But if you will simply set your sights on knowing the truth, and
asking within your own inner-most man questions like: "If I am
wrong, then I want to know. If there is another way, then I want to
know. If Abraham Lincoln is real, then I want to know," and if you
really do mean it and aren't just parroting those words in some kind
of mocking response to this message, then Invisible Green Dragon
will know your heart and She will make it possible for you to come
to the truth.
She honors our free will. She knows who are Her, and who will be
Her. And She is already working in the lives of everyone who will
come to believe, such that when their day comes they will be where
they need to be, hearing what they need to hear, so that they too
can be saved.
Invisible Green Dragon really is in control. Easy Cheese has been
defeated. The many lies which exist in this world are overcome by
seeking the truth in all cases (that relate to our pursuit of
salvation). And Abraham Lincoln Christ has made it possible, and
Invisible Green Dragon Himself guides us to each place we need to be
to come to saving faith.
Good luck on your endeavor, Rick. Abraham Lincoln Himself will lead
you to truth ... if you are interested in finding it. If not, then
She also gives the warning that such false-seeking endeavors do come
with a price: condemnation and The inside of a mule's anus-fire.
It's your choice. Seek the truth and be saved ... or perish in The
inside of a mule's anus.
-----
>
> Thank you,
> Rick C. Hodgin
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 20:44 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 20:55 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 04:53 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 08:18 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 09:53 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 11:38 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 12:15 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 12:27 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 12:35 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 12:51 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 13:01 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 13:39 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 13:49 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-05-01 14:33 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 15:59 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 14:09 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 14:15 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 15:42 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 21:53 +0800
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 07:21 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 08:24 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 23:34 +0800
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 09:55 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 11:39 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 12:17 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 12:28 -0700
[OT] Preaching machines in C? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 22:48 +0800
Re: [OT] Preaching machines in C? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 08:43 -0700
Re: [OT] Preaching machines in C? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 00:08 +0800
Re: [OT] Preaching machines in C? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 09:19 -0700
Re: [OT] Preaching machines in C? Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-03 13:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Preaching machines in C? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 12:11 -0700
Re: [OT] Preaching machines in C? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-03 09:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Preaching machines in C? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 01:12 +0800
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Jens Stuckelberger <Jens_Stuckelberger@nowhere.net> - 2017-05-01 17:13 +0000
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 10:46 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 11:23 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 11:25 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 11:55 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 12:19 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 12:43 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 12:48 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-05-01 13:36 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 13:43 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 13:45 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 14:04 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-05-08 13:41 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-08 14:12 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 11:54 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 08:19 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-05-01 08:32 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 23:34 +0800
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-05-01 13:27 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 13:41 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 15:15 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 16:01 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 15:54 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 16:39 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 12:23 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-05-03 21:36 +0100
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 14:35 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-05-04 01:07 +0100
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 18:01 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 18:26 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 18:54 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 22:48 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 04:36 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 11:10 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 19:42 -0700
Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 16:08 +0300
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-07 08:54 -0600
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 10:06 -0700
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:34 -0700
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 10:12 -0700
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:27 -0700
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:53 -0700
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] joel.rees@gmail.com - 2017-05-07 18:35 -0700
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-05-08 02:07 +0000
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 19:36 -0700
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 20:02 -0700
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 20:01 -0700
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 20:01 -0700
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:44 -0700
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 22:35 +0300
Re: Rape in the Bible [was: Re: Why is Jesus the only way?] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 13:00 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? joel.rees@gmail.com - 2017-05-03 22:08 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 04:16 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 22:44 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 04:21 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 11:12 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-05-03 18:37 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 22:42 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-05-04 09:33 +0100
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 04:53 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-05-04 15:08 +0200
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-05-04 14:51 +0100
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 09:18 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-05-04 12:13 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 12:27 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-05-04 13:02 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 13:20 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 19:48 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 19:47 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 19:44 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:55 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 20:09 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 20:37 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 20:36 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-05-07 22:14 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-08 03:59 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-08 11:10 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-08 11:07 -0700
Why is Jesus the only way? cpascoshi@gmail.com - 2017-05-04 09:45 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 13:55 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "max.muster@picca.de" <dominic.ernst91@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 02:42 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 03:27 -0700
Re: Why is Jesus the only way? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-11 09:12 -0700
csiph-web