Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #353094

Re: done

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: done
Date 2016-05-01 14:17 -0700
Message-ID <D34BC05D.71903%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid> <D34BAED7.718E5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ghjd0a3a.efgh@rooftop.invalid> <D34BB769.718F0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fhjdoaefa@rooftop.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/1/16, 1:55 PM, in article fhjdoaefa@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

... 
>>>>>> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. *
>>>>>> 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see
>>>>>>    if someone is forging me.

...
>>> Cry me a river.  I've seen this often enough:
>>> 
>>> -> Sock A makes a post
>>> --> Somebody B replies to that sock.
>>> ---> You respond to Somebody B, as Snit, but with language making
>>>      it seem as if you were Sock A continuing the discussion.
>>> 
>>> (IOW, you forgot to switch to the sock when replying).
>>> Invariably somebody busts you on it, but it's all crickets from
>>> you at that point, unless later downthread you make one of your
>>> pathetic "Everybody's Snit har har orange you glad i didn't say
>>> banana" whines.
>>> 
>> One word: bullshit.
> 
> Are you bad at math or just lying?

I am noting you have NEVER seen what you claim to have seen. Maybe you think
you have... but no reason to think even that. In short: you are full of
shit. You are lying. It really is that simple.

> I mean, that sentence alone was a lie even before it was finished.
> Then what about all this...

>> Your claim is utter and complete bullshit. The ongoing joke of COLA is
>> everyone is Snit. This is just a fact. I do not think you or others are
>> stupid enough to really believe it.
>> 
>> The fact is I do not use socks and as such there is no evidence I do. There
>> are idiots who post about screencasting and consistency and pretend to be me
>> to fool idiots... and then those who troll pretend to be stupid enough to
>> fall for it.
>> 
>> I am giving you a compliment here: I do not think you are so stupid as to
>> actually fall for it. Are you saying you are? If so, well, I suppose I will
>> accept your word you are THAT stupid.

Remember when you set up a task dealing with recipes and saving them as a
PDF. You accused me of cheating on that - OS X handled the task so well you
literally could not believe it was true. Peter Köhlmann joined you in that.
You both made false and unsupported accusations against ME, ones you could
not in any way support, based on your inability to believe OS X could handle
your hand-picked task as well as it did (not only doing what you asked for
but a LOT more in terms of speed, having smaller file sizes, allowing me to
select text and do searches, etc.).

You both assumed wrong doing based on your own ignorance. In that case I was
able to prove your attack false and you did finally admit to it. Of course I
would not cheat... what would the purpose even be? My goal is not to try to
convince someone of something that is not true but to educate them about how
things can be done. To falsify it would be to go directly against my own
goals! Your accusation did not even make sense... yet you and Peter both
were insistent that I must prove to you that your accusation was false...
neither of you thought for one second about how the burden of proof was on
you to back why I would go against my own self interest and do as you
accused. 

Think of that: you assumed others would go against their own best interest
and do wrong... and you not only failed to show any evidence they would you
gave no reason they would. And you failed to back your claims. You insisted
and whined how others should prove you wrong. Completely backward of you and
absurd... and even then I was kind enough to help educate you, even as you
accused me of things that would be against my own interests.

In this case, of course, you are doing the same thing: pushing an
accusations - but this time one which cannot be proved false. You have no
evidence. You have no reason why I would act against my own self interest
and do such as thing. You have no examples. But you insist it is true. Just
silly. 

Anyway, the gag is mostly about pushing me on the defensive to avoid
speaking about technology. And it is old. Why not drop the gag and come up
with another task - maybe one that is a bit more sensible than downloading
ALL recipes from a home page of a recipe site. Never did quite understand
the value of it... though I did admit it was fun to do.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-29 22:13 +0000
  Re: done John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 15:43 -0700
  Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 19:26 -0400
    Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:50 +0000
      Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 05:51 +0200
        Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:55 +0000
          Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 05:57 +0200
            Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:04 +0000
              Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:07 +0000
                Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 06:08 +0200
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 14:35 +0000
                Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 17:20 +0200
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:40 +0000
                Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 18:11 +0200
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 16:17 +0000
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 17:23 +0000
                Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-01 00:56 +0200
                Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-01 01:30 +0200
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 23:11 +0000
                Re: done Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-01 08:38 +0000
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 15:58 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 11:59 -0700
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 12:00 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 19:48 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:02 -0700
                Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-05-01 22:04 +0200
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:41 -0700
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 13:47 -0700
                Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-05-02 02:21 +0200
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:34 -0700
                Re: done chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-02 08:27 -0500
                Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 15:54 +0200
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 20:16 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:38 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 20:55 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 14:17 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 21:35 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 14:47 -0700
                Re: done Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-05-01 14:56 -0700
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-01 22:37 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:59 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:10 +0000
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-01 23:09 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:11 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:27 +0000
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 00:31 +0000
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:52 +0000
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:04 +0000
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:47 +0000
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:51 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:44 -0700
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:41 -0700
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 19:43 -0700
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 03:36 +0000
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:14 -0700
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:43 -0700
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 22:25 -0700
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 22:27 -0700
                Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 17:45 +0000
                Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 20:16 +0200
                Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 20:46 +0200
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:43 -0700
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 20:55 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:32 -0700
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:38 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:48 +0000
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:49 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:18 -0700
                Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 01:02 +0000
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:10 +0000
                Re: done chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-02 08:31 -0500
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-02 07:27 -0700
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 09:10 -0700
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 10:45 -0700
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 14:51 +0000
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 11:18 -0700
                Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 19:13 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:12 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:27 +0000
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:53 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:42 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:50 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:17 -0700
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:40 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:49 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:16 -0700
                Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 01:02 +0000
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:08 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:33 -0700
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:43 -0700
                Re: done William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-05-02 09:30 +0100
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 16:02 -0700
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 20:36 -0700
                Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 03:40 +0000
                Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:14 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 21:58 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:32 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 22:37 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:55 -0700
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:00 +0000
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:33 +0000
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:13 -0700
                Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 12:01 -0700
          Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 23:58 -0400
            Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:08 +0000
              Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 13:12 +0200
                Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 14:09 +0200
              Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 10:02 -0400
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:05 +0000
                Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 11:19 -0400
                Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:41 +0000
                Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 13:19 -0400
                Re: done Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-30 13:54 -0400
                Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 19:36 -0400
              Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 07:33 -0700

csiph-web