Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #353091
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: done |
| Date | 2016-05-01 20:55 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <fhjdoaefa@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <D34BA044.718CC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid> <D34BAED7.718E5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ghjd0a3a.efgh@rooftop.invalid> <D34BB769.718F0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/1/16, 1:16 PM, in article ghjd0a3a.efgh@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 5/1/16, 12:48 PM, in article fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I wanted to see if it >>>>>> was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to >>>>>> mimic flatfish. >>>>> >>>>> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me: >>>>> >>>>> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. * >>>>> 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see >>>>> if someone is forging me. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in CSMA, >>>>> years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and admitted it as soon >>>>> as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a while in response to some heavy >>>>> trolling, and even used a couple other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when >>>>> I >>>>> foolishly accepted the word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me >>>>> that if I did so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish >>>>> of me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the like, but whatever. >>>>> Years ago. Move the hell on. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you don't like people accusing you of using sock puppets, you should >>>> stop using them. >>> >>> Your assumption that I use them is incorrect. Remember: I have NEVER posted >>> to COLA with any name other than Snit. >>> >>> But the accusations are made over and over and over and over by those who >>> want to put me on the defensive to avoid speaking of Linux and technology... >>> and people who assume others do as they do - use socks and otherwise act >>> poorly. My refusal to sink to their level - and the level you often go - >>> leads you and others to make such unsupported accusations. Of note, you will >>> NEVER show anything from ME showing where I have posted to COLA with any >>> name other than Snit. >> >> Cry me a river. I've seen this often enough: >> >> -> Sock A makes a post >> --> Somebody B replies to that sock. >> ---> You respond to Somebody B, as Snit, but with language making >> it seem as if you were Sock A continuing the discussion. >> >> (IOW, you forgot to switch to the sock when replying). >> Invariably somebody busts you on it, but it's all crickets from >> you at that point, unless later downthread you make one of your >> pathetic "Everybody's Snit har har orange you glad i didn't say >> banana" whines. >> > One word: bullshit. > Are you bad at math or just lying? I mean, that sentence alone was a lie even before it was finished. Then what about all this... > Your claim is utter and complete bullshit. The ongoing joke of COLA is > everyone is Snit. This is just a fact. I do not think you or others are > stupid enough to really believe it. > > The fact is I do not use socks and as such there is no evidence I do. There > are idiots who post about screencasting and consistency and pretend to be me > to fool idiots... and then those who troll pretend to be stupid enough to > fall for it. > > I am giving you a compliment here: I do not think you are so stupid as to > actually fall for it. Are you saying you are? If so, well, I suppose I will > accept your word you are THAT stupid. >
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-29 22:13 +0000
Re: done John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 15:43 -0700
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 19:26 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:50 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 05:51 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:55 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 05:57 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:04 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:07 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 06:08 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 14:35 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 17:20 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:40 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 18:11 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 16:17 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 17:23 +0000
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-01 00:56 +0200
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-01 01:30 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 23:11 +0000
Re: done Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-01 08:38 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 15:58 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 11:59 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 12:00 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 19:48 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:02 -0700
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-05-01 22:04 +0200
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:41 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 13:47 -0700
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-05-02 02:21 +0200
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:34 -0700
Re: done chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-02 08:27 -0500
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 15:54 +0200
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 20:16 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:38 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 20:55 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 14:17 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 21:35 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 14:47 -0700
Re: done Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-05-01 14:56 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-01 22:37 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:59 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:10 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-01 23:09 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:11 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:27 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 00:31 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:52 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:04 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:47 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:51 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:44 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:41 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 19:43 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 03:36 +0000
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:14 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:43 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 22:25 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 22:27 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 17:45 +0000
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 20:16 +0200
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 20:46 +0200
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:43 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 20:55 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:32 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:38 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:48 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:49 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:18 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 01:02 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:10 +0000
Re: done chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-02 08:31 -0500
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-02 07:27 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 09:10 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 10:45 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 14:51 +0000
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 11:18 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 19:13 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:12 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:27 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:53 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:42 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:50 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:17 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:40 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:49 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:16 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 01:02 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:08 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:33 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:43 -0700
Re: done William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-05-02 09:30 +0100
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 16:02 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 20:36 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 03:40 +0000
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:14 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 21:58 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:32 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 22:37 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:55 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:00 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:33 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:13 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 12:01 -0700
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 23:58 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:08 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 13:12 +0200
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 14:09 +0200
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 10:02 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:05 +0000
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 11:19 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:41 +0000
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 13:19 -0400
Re: done Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-30 13:54 -0400
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 19:36 -0400
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 07:33 -0700
csiph-web