Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #231366
| From | Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: "Run fsck manually"..? |
| Date | 2021-02-03 03:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BEgff-3db-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BEe3M-1Zq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEfsR-2Ix-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:41:54AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 07:13:16PM -0500, hobie of RMN wrote: > > He enters "fsck" or "fsck /dev/sda1", and in a short while gets fsck > > identifying it's version, and nothing else. > > There can be issues trying to run fsck on a mounted filesystem. What > happens if you do: > > # touch /forcefsck Oh, sorry, I missed your mention of (initramfs) prompt. So your filesystem is too damaged to allow boot to complete and you won't be able to do that "touch /forcefsck" thing. If fsck is just printing its version it may think it doesn't need to be run. You can force it to do a check/repair with "-f", so: (initramfs) fsck.ext4 -vf /dev/sda1 If it find things that it wants to fix it will ask yuo and you'll have to press 'y' each time. If you're certain that you always want to answer 'y' then you can ctrl-c that and try again with -y: (initramfs) fsck.ext4 -yvf /dev/sda1 If you want to see what it would do without it actually doing it you can use -n instead of -y. Cheers, Andy -- https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 01:20 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Jessica Litwin <jessica@litw.in> - 2021-02-03 01:20 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-02-03 01:30 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Jeremy Andrews <thejeremy.net@gmail.com> - 2021-02-03 02:20 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 02:50 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-02-03 02:50 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-02-03 03:40 +0100
[SOLVED} Re: "Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 05:50 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 05:10 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2021-02-03 09:40 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 13:40 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 17:10 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 17:30 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-02-03 17:40 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 21:10 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 22:00 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-04 02:10 +0100
csiph-web