Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #231363
| From | "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: "Run fsck manually"..? |
| Date | 2021-02-03 02:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BEfsR-2Ix-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BEfsR-2Ix-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEe3M-1Zq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEe3M-1Zq-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEedr-22o-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEeZQ-2z6-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> You might have to boot from a recovery CD image, such as a Debian live > install image, or GParted Live. You can't actually run fsck on a drive > while said drive is mounted. Thank, Jeremy. But - is /dev/sda1 mounted at this point? Isn't it being indicated to us that it can't be successfully mounted? (Thinking of the Busybox appearance and (intramfs) reference.) > On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 19:24, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> > wrote: > >> >> My brother's Debian system suddenly says on attempt to boot, >> "/dev/sda1: >> >> UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY:Runfsck manually", and, "inodes that were >> part >> of >> >> a corrupted orphan linked list found." >> >> >> >> He enters "fsck" or "fsck /dev/sda1", and in a short while gets fsck >> >> identifying it's version, and nothing else. Tha appears to take >> place >> >> from (initramfs) and Busybox. An attempt to reboot just starts the >> >> problem all over again. >> >> >> >> We'd be grateful for help with this. Thanks. >> >> >> > hello, >> > >> > fsck -fy /dev/sda1 is probably what you want >> >> Then again, after the "UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY", the `-f` flag to >> `fsck` shouldn't be needed. This is weird. >> >> >> Stefan >> >> >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 01:20 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Jessica Litwin <jessica@litw.in> - 2021-02-03 01:20 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-02-03 01:30 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Jeremy Andrews <thejeremy.net@gmail.com> - 2021-02-03 02:20 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 02:50 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-02-03 02:50 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-02-03 03:40 +0100
[SOLVED} Re: "Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 05:50 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 05:10 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2021-02-03 09:40 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 13:40 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 17:10 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 17:30 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-02-03 17:40 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 21:10 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 22:00 +0100
Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-04 02:10 +0100
csiph-web