Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #231361

Re: "Run fsck manually"..?

From Jeremy Andrews <thejeremy.net@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: "Run fsck manually"..?
Date 2021-02-03 02:20 +0100
Message-ID <BEeZQ-2z6-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BEe3M-1Zq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEe3M-1Zq-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEedr-22o-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

You might have to boot from a recovery CD image, such as a Debian live
install image, or GParted Live. You can't actually run fsck on a drive
while said drive is mounted.

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 19:24, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
wrote:

> >> My brother's Debian system suddenly says on attempt to boot, "/dev/sda1:
> >> UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY:Runfsck manually", and, "inodes that were part
> of
> >> a corrupted orphan linked list found."
> >>
> >> He enters "fsck" or "fsck /dev/sda1", and in a short while gets fsck
> >> identifying it's version, and nothing else.  Tha appears to take place
> >> from (initramfs) and Busybox.  An attempt to reboot just starts the
> >> problem all over again.
> >>
> >> We'd be grateful for help with this.  Thanks.
> >>
> > hello,
> >
> > fsck -fy /dev/sda1 is probably what you want
>
> Then again, after the "UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY", the `-f` flag to
> `fsck` shouldn't be needed.  This is weird.
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

"Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 01:20 +0100
  Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Jessica Litwin <jessica@litw.in> - 2021-02-03 01:20 +0100
    Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-02-03 01:30 +0100
      Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Jeremy Andrews <thejeremy.net@gmail.com> - 2021-02-03 02:20 +0100
        Re: "Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 02:50 +0100
  Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-02-03 02:50 +0100
    Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-02-03 03:40 +0100
      [SOLVED} Re: "Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 05:50 +0100
    Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 05:10 +0100
      Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2021-02-03 09:40 +0100
      Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 13:40 +0100
        Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 17:10 +0100
          Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 17:30 +0100
            Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-02-03 17:40 +0100
            Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 21:10 +0100
              Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 22:00 +0100
                Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-04 02:10 +0100

csiph-web