Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #567978

Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular.

From benj <none@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular.
References (2 earlier) <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.4{0.31P.Seattle.2016}> <nduhm4$64h$1@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.4{2.33P.Seattle.2016}> <ndutcd$dei$1@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.4{5.45P.Seattle.2016}>
Message-ID <AzEMy.7$kQ1.4@fx39.iad> (permalink)
Organization TeraNews.com
Date 2016-04-04 21:31 -0400

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 04/04/2016 08:45 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>
>
>     Michael Moroney wrote:
>     > We certainly know that gravity is not getting weaker.
>
>     Wong, Gravity/eXergy ( energy that can do work ) is dying off.
>     "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular.
>
>     When the cosmos (nearly) hits thermodynamic equilibrium,
>     all motion ceases, whereupon gravity is (nearly) dead and burried.
>
>     Once "Dark Energy" (Entropy) wins, gravity/eXergy is gone.
>
Have you read any HVAC? He's into lies and fantasy too. You two should 
be fine butt buddies!



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-29 22:18 -0700
  Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 08:09 +0200
    Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-30 00:48 -0700
      Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 10:04 +0200
        Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 02:30 -0700
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 07:08 -0700
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 10:54 -0400
      Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 07:20 -0500
  Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-03-30 02:50 -0700
    Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 03:05 -0700
      Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 13:42 +0200
    Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 14:21 +0200
    Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 07:21 -0500
  Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 07:18 -0500
    Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-30 05:55 -0700
      Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 08:27 -0500
        Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-30 17:40 -0700
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 08:09 +0200
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 10:25 -0500
      Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 15:53 +0200
        Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-30 17:37 -0700
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 08:05 +0200
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 06:02 -0700
            Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 12:12 -0400
            Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-02 16:24 -0700
              Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 10:26 -0500
      Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 07:11 -0700
  Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 08:09 -0500
  Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 22:30 -0700
    Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-31 00:18 -0700
      Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 09:41 +0200
      Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 11:35 -0500
        Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-31 21:11 -0700
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 08:02 +0200
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 07:20 -0500
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 08:43 -0500
            Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-01 18:55 -0700
              Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 22:35 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-01 22:50 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 07:56 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-02 16:56 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 20:21 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-02 19:59 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 15:01 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-03 17:13 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 19:18 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-03 18:02 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 20:22 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-04 00:07 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 07:45 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-04 11:59 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 08:50 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-04 19:08 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:40 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:10 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-04 11:34 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime is "eXergy" ( energy that can do work ). moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 20:09 +0000
                Re: Gravity/eXergy ( energy that can do work ) is dying off. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 23:29 +0000
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 21:31 -0400
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-05 05:55 +0000
                Re: Even stars _must_ evaporate. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:03 -0400
                Re: Even stars _must_ evaporate. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-05 16:15 +0000
                Re: Hawking Radiation, Heat Death of the Universe. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-04-05 16:26 -0400
                Re: Hawking Radiation, Heat Death of the Universe. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 18:59 +0000
                Eventually, everything evaporates away, including gravity. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 16:59 -0700
                Re: Eventually, everything evaporates away, including gravity. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 20:38 -0400
                Re: Many organisms would consume you. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-04-06 21:05 -0400
                Many organisms would consume you. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 06:35 -0700
                Re: Many organisms would consume you. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 10:22 -0400
                Many organisms would consume you. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 13:00 -0700
                Science doesn't cater to your foolish dreams. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 13:16 -0700
                Re: Science doesn't cater to your foolish dreams. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 21:18 -0400
                Science doesn't cater to your foolish dreams. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 06:57 -0700
                Re: Science doesn't cater to your foolish dreams. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 14:31 -0400
                Re: Eventually, everything evaporates away, including gravity. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-07 13:52 +0000
                Re: Your pet theory of the universe. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-07 20:48 +0000
                Re: It takes energy to separate objects. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-08 13:43 +0000
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-05 18:57 -0700
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:57 -0500
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:25 -0400
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-06 10:01 -0700
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-06 20:23 -0700
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:05 -0500
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-07 18:01 -0700
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 20:26 -0500
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 07:09 -0500
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 06:32 -0700
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 09:16 -0500
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:32 -0500
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 19:23 -0700
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-11 17:54 -0700
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-11 21:00 -0700
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 00:02 -0700
                Re: "The Heat Death of the Universe" is like evolution, but less popular. Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-12 00:35 -0700
      Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 22:12 -0700
        Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 08:28 +0200
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 08:35 +0200
            Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-01 19:03 -0700
              Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 09:19 +0200
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-03 00:40 -0700
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 08:40 +0200
        Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-01 03:25 -0700
          Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 07:31 -0500
            Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-01 19:32 -0700
              Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:07 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-04 19:02 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 06:55 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-05 18:35 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:18 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:01 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:00 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-06 20:25 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:09 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-07 17:43 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 19:58 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 20:19 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-07 23:02 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 07:18 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 12:09 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 14:20 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 12:26 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 23:26 -0400
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 13:06 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 16:31 -0500
                theoretically noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 22:03 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 14:46 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 13:07 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 16:28 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 16:31 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 19:28 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 10:26 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-10 14:36 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 17:59 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 08:21 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-11 17:56 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 20:58 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-11 19:44 -0700
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 08:09 -0500
                Re: Riedt's monocentric universe theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 08:07 -0500

csiph-web